Un democratico ha appena suggerito una frode elettorale -- e nessuno lo ha chiamato su di esso

Ad un raduno durante il fine settimana, l'ex governo democratico della Virginia. Terry McAuliffe ha fatto qualcosa per cui il suo partito ha ripetutamente criticato Donald Trump e i repubblicani: He suggested a past election had been unfairly decided because of ballot shenanigans.

Con 2018 Georgia gubernatorial nominee Stacey Abrams by his side, McAuliffe said this:
“Lei sarebbe il governatore della Georgia oggi se il governatore della Georgia non avesse privato i suoi diritti di voto 1.4 milioni di elettori della Georgia prima delle elezioni. That’s what happened to Stacey Abrams. They took the votes away.
    Which is not, infatti, what happened.
      Let’s go back and revisit what we know about that 2018 gara.
        At the heart of the controversy surrounding it was the fact that Brian Kemp refused to resign as secretary of statewho oversees Georgia’s electionswhile he was an active candidate for governor. Kemp repeatedly refused to do so. “While outside agitators disparage this office and falsely attack us, we have kept our head down and remained focused on ensuring secure, accessibile, and fair elections for all voters,” he said in a statement in October 2018.
        Democrats also noted that Kemp, come segretario di stato, had overseen a years-long purge of inactive voters from the vote rolls in the state and flagged more than 50,000 voter registrations the month before the election because they didn’t meet theexact matchstandard in which any erroreven a clerical onecan disqualify a registration. (Il Associated Press estimated that 70% of the applications caught up in thatexact matchcontroversy were from minority voters.)

          All of which are credible and serious issues. But none of which suggestas McAuliffe didthat actual Abrams votes were taken away from her.
          As Charles S. Bullock III, political science professor at the University of Georgia, told The Washington Post’s Fact Checker in 2019: “Abrams was very effective in mobilizing her supporters, but in the end — perhaps due to a narrowing of the enthusiasm gap following the [Brett] Kavanaugh hearings — lots of Republicans also turned out. Il [frode degli elettori] claim is not based on fact but will continue to be articulated by Abrams since it helps mobilize her supporters.
          The Washington Post editorial board condemned McAuliffe for pushingunprovable allegations that will contribute to the corrosion of trust” e l'ho notato: “There is no way to know whether Ms. Abrams would have won if Georgia’s registration laws and practices had been different.
          None of this is to say that McAuliffe’s indulgent attempt to suggest Abrams had somehow been cheated out of the governor’s mansion in 2018 is equal to what Trump and his allies have done. In the latter case, there has been a months-long disinformation campaign aimed at eroding trust in our democratic systemdespite zero actual evidence that suggests the sort of widespread fraud that is being alleged.
            Suo non the same. What Trump is doing is far more deleterious to democracy than what McAuliffe said.
            Comunque, Democrats like McAuliffe need to hold themselves to a higher standard knowing that the likes of Trump are actively undermining trust in elections. Got proof of election fraud? Let’s see it. Altrimenti, shelve the rhetoric.

            I commenti sono chiusi.