앤디 퍼즈더: Biden은 낙태에 대한 과학을 무시합니다 – 그는 인생이 언제 시작되는지에 대한 질문에 정치를 따릅니다.

그럼에도 불구하고, 바이든 대통령 immediately decried the decision as “Roe v 사건에서 여성의 헌법적 권리에 대한 전례 없는 공격. 걸어 건너기.” 잘, 아프가니스탄에 대해 이야기하는 것보다 확실히 낫습니다., the jobs numbers, inflation or the border.

Biden subsequently attempted to assuage the other side of this contentious issue, stating that while he respected the views of peoplewho believe life begins at the moment of conception and all,” he just didn’tagreewith them.

조나단 털리: BIDEN’S CONSTITUTION WORKAROUNDS – PRESIDENT DOESN’T SEEM TO SEE LIMITS FOR GOVERNMENT

Much was made on social media about that statement being inconsistent with Biden’s prior statements on the issue – and his Catholic faith. But perhaps more concerning was his willingness to ignorethe sciencedespite his oft repeated commitment tofollow the science.

The science on when human life begins is not in serious dispute. 예를 들면, the American College of Pediatricians’ (ACP) website states that “[티]he predominance of human biological research confirms that human life begins at conception—fertilization. At fertilization, the human being emerges as a whole, genetically distinct, individuated zygotic living human organism, a member of the species Homo sapiens, needing only the proper environment in order to grow and develop. The difference between the individual in its adult stage and in its zygotic stage is one of form, not nature.

의견 뉴스 레터를 구독하려면 여기를 클릭하세요.

While the wordzygotic” (원래, a fertilized egg) isn’t a term you hear every day, the science behind the ACP’s statement is straightforward.

As a young trial lawyer in the early 1980s, I was one of a group of attorneys in St. Louis who defended individuals charged with trespassing forsitting-inat abortions clinics. We employed the justification defense, which required proof that those defendants were violating misdemeanor trespass laws to accomplish a higher societal value – protecting human life. Our first job was to convince the judge and jury that human life began at conception as a scientific fact – as opposed to a personal or religious belief – otherwise the judge would not allow the defense to go to the jury or the jury would reject it.

의견 더보기

It proved an easier task that I anticipated. Our medical experts laid it out as follows.

먼저, we know that from the time of conception there is an individual because the unborn child has its own unique genetic structure, different from the mother, father or any other human who has ever lived.

둘째, we know we have a 인간 as the unborn child has the correct number of chromosomes.

드디어, we know we have 생명 because we can watch the initial cells grow. In what is called the test-tube baby procedure, you can watch human cells grow literally from fertilization.

The science is crystal clear – each individual human life begins at conception.

Even the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe offers no support for Biden ignoring the science. In Roe, the Supreme Court avoided the question of when human life begins first by holding thatthe word ‘person,’ as used in the 14th Amendment, does not include the unborn.” 따라서, unborn children are not entitled to the right to life afforded by that amendment.

While the legality of abortion may involve balancing the value of early human life against the interests of the mother, the science is incontrovertible – an individual human life begins at conception and ends at death.

댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..