Attacking Democrats as radical socialists worked in 2020, Democrats admit

A Democratic post-mortem of the 2020 election reveals this troubling reality: Many voters were convinced by Republican attacks that the Democratic Party and its candidates embraced socialism and other radical views.

Campaign public discoursein paid media, earned media, and direct voter contactand message and opinion research indicated that voters recalled attacks related to ‘radical socialists,’ 「警察を払い戻す,’ and related messages,” read a section of the report, which was conducted by a series of Democratic advocacy groups including Third Way and the Latino Victory Project, and which was first obtained by The New York Times.
According to the analysis, a six-month deep dive into the messaging in various 2020 contests around the country, the socialism attack was the one that stung the most. 再び, here’s the 報告する:
    The socialism attack was called out by many Members of Congress and candidates who were not successful who believe it hurt campaigns in states and districts with immigrant populations that fled socialist governments, including among Venezuelan, Cuban, Vietnamese, and Filipino voters.
      ザ・ results in 2020 House races bear that out. Democrats were swamped in heavily-Cuban south Florida (losing the 26th and 27th districts) as well as as in California, where they lost three seats with considerable Hispanic and other minority communities. (Republicans netted a surprising 12 seats nationwide.)

        レポート, viewed broadly, should sound the alarm for Democrats looking to 2022 — even as the party finds itself in a civil war between its liberal and moderate wings over election reform and the use of the filibuster more broadly.
        (月曜日の朝, ニューヨーク民主党議員. ジャマール・ボウマン と呼ばれる ウェストバージニア州民主党. ジョー・マンチン “the new Mitch McConnellin an interview with CNN’s “新しい日。” Manchin announced in an op-ed on Sunday that he would not vote for the “人民法のために” and would oppose any effort to get rid of the legislative filibuster.)
          The party is deeply divided over the right way forwardwhether to continue to work for compromise with Republicans (as Manchin and President Joe Biden are advocating) on major issues or whether to push through as many liberal priorities as possible before the 2022 選挙 (as Bowman and lots of his fellow liberals in Congress support).
          The Democratic post-mortem suggests that if Democrats attempt to take the latter, liberal route, the likelihood of them keeping their House majority come next November is considerably weakened. (伝統的に, the president’s party loses a considerable number of House seats in his first midterm election in office; Republicans lost 40 House seats in the 2018 バイデンの影響に関するオールスターパネル while Democrats lost 63 House seats in the first midterm election of Barack Obama’s presidency.)
          問題, もちろん, is that the liberal base of the party is ascendant. Aside from Biden, the best-known Democrats in the party are either well-established liberals like Speaker Nancy Pelosi or avowed democratic socialists like Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont or Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York.
          And while democratic socialism is ない the same thing as socialism, that nuance has been glossed over in past Republican attacks — そして, as the post-mortem makes clear, voters don’t tend to see that nuance either.
            共和党員, もちろん, see opportunity here. In his return to the 2022 campaign trail over the weekend in North Carolina, Trump insisted thatJoe Biden and the Socialist Democrats are the most radical left-wing administration in history” 一点に. At another, he insisted thatthe socialist Democrats quest for whatever it is they’re looking for, because nobody knows, I don’t even think they know, truly knows no bounds.
            Trump’s rhetoric is only the leading edge of what will be a main thrust of the Republican argument against total Democratic control in Washington heading into the 2022 中間選挙. And the timing of the radical socialist attack could hardly come at a worse time for Democrats — 着陸, as it does, right in the middle of a fight over what the second half of Biden’s first two years in office should look like.