During his confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Dettelbach faced a grilling by Sen. 톰 코튼, R-Ark., who called him out for how he supported an assault weapons ban during his campaign, despite not knowing what that would mean.
“When I was a candidate for office, I did talk about restrictions on assault weapons. I did not define the term. And I haven’t gone through the process of defining that term,” Dettelbach acknowledged.
“So you’re running for public office, and you called for a ban on assault weapons, but you don’t have a definition for assault weapons?” Cotton asked.
Dettelbach explained that deciding which weapons fall under the category of “공격 무기” is the job of lawmakers. He recognized it “would be a difficult task” to define what assault weapons are, because making it too limited in scope would not “offer the protections that are intended,” while making it too broad “infringes unnecessarily on the rights of citizens.”
Cotton argued that “공격 무기” is a made-up term used by “politicians and lawyers in Washington.” He noted that guns have classifications such as pistol, rifle and shotgun and that each have defined characteristics, but assault weapons do not.
“I think it’s very telling that you’re nominated to lead the ATF and you don’t have a definition of assault weapon. And point is that there is really no such thing as a category of weapons known as assault weapons,” the senator said.
Cotton recalled that Congress did define assault weapons with a 1994 반, but Dettelbach admitted that he is “not particularly familiar with” 그것.