拜登承诺’ 研究进步主义者推动法院包装的最高法院改革

Biden 'committed' to study Supreme Court reforms as progressives push for court packing

拜登总统 是 “committedto following through on his campaign pledge of forming a bipartisan commission to study 最高法院 reforms, 白宫星期三说.

Biden said in October he’d put together a bipartisan commission of scholars to send him recommendations within 180 days on how to reform a court system that’sgetting out of whack.The White House said Wednesday Biden would be moving forward with the plans to study the federal judiciary.

The President remains committed to an expert study of the role and debate over reform of the court and will have more to say in the coming weeks,” a White House official told Fox News.

BIDEN TO LOOK AT COURT-PACKING ‘ALTERNATIVES,’ FORM COMMISSION TO ‘REFORMCOURT SYSTEM

The commission was Biden’s response to progressive demands to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court to overcome the 6-3 conservative majority, a practice known ascourt packing.

The White House declined to confirm a Politico story out Wednesday that said Biden is already staffing up his commission, with Biden’s campaign lawyer Bob Bauer and Yale Law School professor Cristina Rodríguez serving as co-chairs. The outlet also reported that Caroline Fredrickson, the former president of the American Constitution Society, and Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and a former assistant attorney general during the George W. Bush Administration, will also serve on the commission.

Since Biden’s election win and Democrats taking control of the House and Senate, progressives groups have doubled down on their demands to pack the court.

在星期三, eight progressive organizations banded together to form theUnrig the Courtscoalition to pressure Democrats to use their power to act. Their four demands are expanding the number of justices on the Supreme Court, expanding lower federal courts, enacting term limits for Supreme Court justices and improving ethics and transparency requirements for justices.

GOP BLASTS BIDEN’S CLIMATE GAMBIT: ‘IT’S A FULL-OUT ASSAULT ON THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

The Supreme Court has become too partisan and too political, and with a united Democratic government, the time to act is now,” Demand Justice Executive Director Brian Fallon said in a statement Wednesday. “的 6-3 Republican-appointed majority consistently sides with Republican politicians and corporate interests over the American people, and we must act before they rig the rules of our democracy even further.

Biden previously had been cool to the idea of court packing, saying he’snot a fanof the practice.

During an interview with CBS News’ “60 分钟” 在十月, Biden laid out his vision for the commission and foralternativesto packing.

If elected, what I will do is I’ll put together a national commission, a bipartisan commission of scholars, constitutional scholars, 民主党人, 共和党人, 自由主义者, 保守派,” 拜登说. “I will ask them to, 过度 180 天, come back to me with recommendations as to how to reform the court system because it’s getting out of whack.

DEM SENATOR INTRODUCES DC STATEHOOD BILLBUT EFFORT FACES UPHILL BATTLE

It’s not about court packing,” 他继续. “There’s a number of other things that our constitutional scholars have debated, and I’ve looked to see what recommendations that commission might make. … There’s a number of alternatives that go well beyond packing.

Shortly before that interview, Fox News uncovered Biden’s more outspoken take on the issue back in 1983, calling it a ‘bonehead’ 理念.

拜登, then a U.S. Senator from 特拉华州, made the comments during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in July 1983 regarding nominations to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 当时, 共和党人 President Ronald Reagan had stoked controversy for attempting to replace three members of the commission.

President Roosevelt clearly had the right to send to the United States Senate and the United States Congress a proposal to pack the court. It was totally within his right to do that. He violated no law. He was legalistically, absolutely correct,” 拜登, 然后 40, told the committee. “But it was a bonehead idea. It was a terrible, terrible mistake to make. And it put in question, if for an entire decade, the independence of the most-significant body … in this country, the Supreme Court of the United States of America.

福克斯新闻’ Evie Fordham and Bradford Betz contributed to this report.

评论被关闭.