La comisión de la Corte Suprema de Biden debate el empaquetamiento de la corte en medio de una reacción liberal al enfoque dividido de la reforma

Los materiales de discusión presentaron una visión mixta sobre el empaquetamiento de la cancha., which drew backlash from some progressives who believe Biden and Democrats in Congress should pack the court with multiple liberal justices after Republicans confirmed three justices during former President Donald Trump’s tenure.

BOSTON BOMBER: BARRETT ASKS DOJ LAWYER WHY BIDEN ADMIN WANTS TO REINSTATE DEATH SENTENCE AMID EXECUTION PAUSE

The meeting opens at 10 soy. with discussion of the reason many are calling for court reform. Most of the substantive discussion on court-packing is likely to happen between 11:10 soy. y 12:50 pm. when the commissioners will deliberateMembership and Size of the Court,” according to the public agenda of the meeting.

En este abril 23, 2021, Foto de archivo miembros de la Corte Suprema posan para una foto grupal en la Corte Suprema en Washington. Seated from left are Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Standing from left are Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Many progressives, upset that former President Donald Trump got to appoint three justices, want to pack the court with more liberal justices. (Erin Schaff / The New York Times vía AP, Piscina, Archivo)

En este abril 23, 2021, Foto de archivo miembros de la Corte Suprema posan para una foto grupal en la Corte Suprema en Washington. Seated from left are Associate Justice Samuel Alito, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John Roberts, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer and Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Standing from left are Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Many progressives, upset that former President Donald Trump got to appoint three justices, want to pack the court with more liberal justices. (Erin Schaff / The New York Times vía AP, Piscina, Archivo) (AP)

Proponents of Court expansion argue that by adding two or more seats to the Supreme Court, Democratic lawmakers could help restore balance to – and, thus, the legitimacy of – the Court. Those who take this perspective also emphasize that a failure to respond to the hardball tactics since 2016 might encourage future aggressive measures in the Senate confirmation process,” the discussion materials released Thursday say of court-packing.

But the risks of Court expansion are considerable, including that it could undermine the very goal of some of its proponents of restoring the Court’s legitimacy,” the materials continue. “Recent polls suggest that a majority of the public does not support Court expansion. And even some supporters of Court expansion acknowledged during the Commission’s public hearings, the reform… would be perceived by many as a partisan maneuver.

The progressive American Constitution Society president Russ Feingold hit back against the commission’s balanced approach.

We have said since the Commission’s beginning that for the Commission to provide a meaningful contribution to restoring the legitimacy of our judiciary, it needs to advance a specific list of Supreme Court reforms that can be acted upon in the near term,” dijo el jueves. “The discussion materials released today unfortunately fail to match the urgency of the situation and do not lay out a solution to the legitimacy crisis before us.

Later in the day the commission will also debate potential reforms related to term limits for justices, potential rotation of justices, case selection and the Supreme Court’s broader role within the Untied States’ sistema de gobierno.

los comentarios están cerrados.