He allowed that while he will eventually retire, “because I don’t want to die there in office,” he hasn’t decided exactly when. “There are a lot of considerations,” Breyer said. “But not here, not now.”
Breyer is in the midst of promoting his latest book, “裁判所の権限と政治の危険,” based on a previous Harvard speech in which he expressed concern about the possible erosion of public confidence in the court’s opinions and criticized the practice of referring to justices by the party of the president who appointed them instead of by their jurisprudential differences.
He repeated his familiar mantra over the years, that the court is not composed of “junior varsity politicians.”
In Sunday’s interview, he said that with presidential appointments, 時間とともに, the court can adjust to political circumstances, but he rejected any notion that he is blinded by a new reality that the court has become more ideological in recent years. “If you go back into history, you know the court has had many ups and downs.”
In defending the court, Breyer said that he has never seen his colleagues trade votes and pointed to some cases over hot button issues that haven’t broken down along familiar ideological lines. He said the court responds to a public seeking the rule of law.
“It’s not too difficult to see what happens in countries and in places and in times when people don’t follow the rule of law,” he warned.
Two conservative justices this week have also argued that the court is above politics.
, Justice エイミーコニーバレット told an audience in Kentucky that her goal was to convince it that the
“court is not comprised of a bunch of partisan hacks
,” による Louisville Courier Journal. And in a wide-ranging speech Thursday night
, Justice Clarence Thomas said that the biggest misconception about the court is that people think the justices are like politicians
“I think the media makes it sound as though you are just always going right to your personal preference,” Thomas said. “So if they think you are anti-abortion,” they think “that is the way you will always come out.”
“That is a problem,” Thomas said. “You are going to jeopardize any faith in the legal institutions.”