“I’m elated that the Colorado courts upheld the principle that Colorado’s anti-discrimination laws are valid, constitutional and will be enforced and that people cannot evade them with appeals to religious beliefs or claims of expression, especially when the conduct is not expressive in any reasonable way,” Scardina told CNN.
“I have tremendous respect for (Phillips) as a human. I think he’s entitled to his religious beliefs,” sy het gese. “I share many of those religious beliefs, and I think we agree far more than we disagree, egter, I’ve always felt that he doesn’t appreciate that basic principle.”
Dismissal of the earlier filing
Scardina first filed a CADA discrimination charge against the bakery on July 20, 2017, but the administrative case was dismissed “with prejudice” in Maart 2019 by the Colorado Civil Rights Division. Scardina filed the lawsuit in June 2019.
Scardina said it all started when she had heard about Phillips’ comments in his 2012 trial and wanted to see if the wedding event was the only reason he declined to make the cake.
Op daardie tydstip, Phillips said he would be happy to make birthday cakes, shower cakes, koekies, and brownies, but he cannot create a custom cake for a same-sex wedding because it “expressed messages that contradict his religious beliefs,” volgens hofstukke.
“I was very hurt at the time, but as things progressed, I kept hearing him say that this wasn’t about the individual, it was about the religious nature of the marriage ceremony,” Scardina said. “So when I heard him say he would be happy to make a birthday cake, I decided to take him up on that offer.”
Scardina called the bakery on June 26, 2017, the same day the Supreme Court decided to hear Phillips’ saak, and asked Phillips’ wife for a cake to feed six to eight people for her upcoming birthday party in July.
“I explained to them that it would be a cake with pink on the inside and blue on the outside,” sy het gese.
Scardina then explained the personal meaning of the cake as a transgender woman and she said the tone of the call changed. She was told the bakery “probably could not make that cake because of the message,” volgens hofstukke.
“Me. Scardina then asked Mrs. Phillips to repeat her statements so someone else could hear, at which point Mrs. Phillips believed something was wrong with the conversation and told the caller she would get Mr. Phillips on the phone. Mev. Phillips then went to get Mr. Phillips to take the call, but when he picked up the phone, the line was disconnected,” the court documents say.
When Scardina called back, the baker’s daughter answered and confirmed the requested cake “isn’t a cake we could make,” volgens hofstukke.
Phillips claims “his religious beliefs prevent him from creating a custom cake celebrating a transition from male to female because expressing that message — that such a transition is possible and should be celebrated — would violate his religious convictions,” volgens hofstukke.
He also argued that this only applies to custom cakes, because they come in a box bearing the name of the bakery and show where the cake came from, die dokumente gesê.
“Jack Phillips serves all people but shouldn’t be forced to create custom cakes with messages that violate his conscience
,” Kristen Waggoner
’ attorney through the Alliance Defending Freedom General Counsel
, in 'n verklaring gesê.
“Radical activists and government officials are targeting artists like Jack because they won’t promote messages on marriage and sexuality that violate their core convictions.
Court says request was not ‘set-up’ to initiate litigation
The court confirmed Scardina’s actions were not “‘set-up’ to initiate litigation” but were seeking to “challenge the veracity” of Phillips’ kommentaar lewer, volgens die liassering.
The court said the decision was based on several factors including the fact that Phillips’ wife admitted they would have sold the cake if Scardina had not disclosed the meaning behind it, and Scardina did not ask for a message on the cake, simply a pink and blue design.
“We will appeal this decision and continue to defend the freedom of all Americans to peacefully live and work according to their deeply held beliefs without fear of punishment,” Waggoner said.
In 2018, the Supreme Court held that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission showed hostility toward the baker based on his religious beliefs, in the case in which he refused to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding. Egter, it was a partial win because it left unsettled the broader constitutional questions on religious liberty.
The case was one of the most anticipated rulings of the term and was considered by some as a follow-up from the court’s decision three years ago to clear the way for same-sex marriage nationwide.
That opinion expressed respect for those with religious objections to gay marriage.