著者は、彼の窮状はUSAトゥデイの結果であると主張しました “多様性委員会” ニュースルームの管理. 彼はまた、彼らが負けた後、それは最終的に裏目に出るだろうと警告しました “half their potential readers to pursue their activist staffer’s narrow political agendas.”
Former deputy editorial page editor Dave Mastio published the piece rebuking his old employer in the New York Post on Thursday. It began with a quick summary of what allegedly happened to him after he offended the woke staffers with his tweet stating that women get pregnant.
“I know something about Gannett’s evolution since I was USA Today’s deputy editorial page editor until August, when I was demoted after I tweeted, ‘People who are pregnant are also women,’” 彼は主張した.
According to Mastio, a fellow USA Today reporter, who was on the “多様性, equity and inclusion” beat had written a story insisting that “transgender men can get pregnant.” Mastio claimed, “I compounded my sin against this new orthodoxy by calling the idea that men can get pregnant an ‘opinion.’”
The former deputy editor alleged that his employer threatened him with a demotion if he refused to delete his tweets. “If I wanted to keep any job at USA Today, my bosses informed me, I needed to delete these offensive tweets because they were causing pain to the LGBTQ activists and journalists on our staff.”
In a corresponding Twitter thread, Mastio provided further details as to his ousting. “Young woke activists on staff had been fighting for months to scrub the ‘discriminatory’ and ‘hateful’ phrase ‘pregnant women’ from USAT. Last August, they finally succeeded in replacing it with ‘pregnant people’ in a breaking news alert after the CDC used the same language,” 彼はツイートした, before detailing how he stepped out of line.
“I subtweeted them saying ‘the people who get pregnant are also called women.’ @susmiller [Susan Miller], a USA TODAY news editor rebuked me by sending a link to USA TODAY’s ‘news’ story that detailed the lives of trans men who had babies,” Mastio claimed.
After reiterating on Twitter how he claimed that wasn’t his “意見,” Mastio tweeted, “For this, I was demoted from Deputy Editorial Page Editor and initially threatened with a $ 30,000 a year pay cut.”
Back in his New York Post column, Mastio alleged that “that the LGBTQ Employee Resource Group and the newsroom ‘diversity’ committee thought I should be fired.” Though Mastio never indicated he was fired, he only noted on Twitter that, after having to sit through “multiple meetings with the ‘diversity’ committee and the LGBTQ Employee Resource Committee,” 彼 “moved on” from the company.