Research involving the role uncertainty plays in the development of feelings of paranoia was already underway when the pandemic began, so the team built on their data in real-time. Using online surveys and card games in which rules could suddenly change, possibly prompting people to change choices regardless of prior outcomes, the team found increased levels of paranoia and choice volatility among the general population.
Taking it a step further, they also investigated the effect of public health policy choices in states where masks were mandated versus recommended, ニュースリリースによると. Their findings suggested an uptick in paranoia and erratic choice behavior in areas with mandates. They also found an association between feelings of paranoia and greater acceptance of conspiracy theories regarding masks, vaccines and QAnon theories.
“From a policy standpoint, it is clear that if a government sets rules, it is important that they are enforced and people are supported for complying,” Phil Corlett, associated professor of psychology and senior author of the study, ニュースリリースで言った. “Otherwise they may feel betrayed and act erratically.”
He added that the findings reflected “essentially people got paranoid when there was a rule and people were not following it.”
The team noted that heightened paranoia following crises, whether terror attacks or pandemics or other events, has been documented before.