DC mayor sued for alleged First Amendment violations

DC mayor sued for alleged First Amendment violations

D.C. Mayor Bowser is facing a fresh lawsuit alleging that the city discriminated against anti-abortion viewpoints in the way it handled expression during “검은 생명의 문제” (BLM) protests.

The issue arose out of a headline-catching confrontation between Students for Life of America (SFLA) members and the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), which arrested them as they attempted to chalkBlack Preborn Lives Matteron the sidewalk outside of a Planned Parenthood affiliate.

Filed on Wednesday, the lawsuit alleges that D.C. violated the First Amendment by applying a defacement ordinance to those individuals, but not to others who wrote anti-cop or “검은 생명의 문제” messages in the city.

In its filing, SFLA and the Frederick Douglass Foundation note that Bower commissioned a “검은 생명의 문제” mural that was painted on D.C. street. Another mural reading, “Defund the Policewas also painted on the same street by BLM D.C.


It’s unclear the extent to which MPD enforced the defacement ordinance with other forms of speech, as the lawsuit alleged. But according to NPR, the city’s Department of Public Works was later seen refreshing some of the paint but leftdefund the policeon the street. “Well it’s not a part of the mural,” Bowser told ABC News in June. “And we certainly encourage expression but we are using the city streets for city art.When ABC’s Martha Raddatz pressed her further, Bowser said she hadn’teven had an opportunity to review it.

The lawsuit also references graffiti at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce headquarters.

Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative nonprofit representing the groups, argued that the government can’t pick and choose which speech it allows.

“The government can’t discriminate against certain viewpoints by allowing some voices to be heard while silencing others,” ADF Legal Counsel Elissa Graves said.

“Because of the city’s actions, Frederick Douglass Foundation and Students for Life of America weren’t able to participate in the public square as other groups have. The First Amendment prohibits the government from picking and choosing whose speech to allow.”


The lawsuit touched on a frequent refrain among conservativesthat liberals seemed to allow “검은 생명의 문제” protests while suppressing other activities, particularly during the pandemic.

Neither the MPD nor Bowser’s office immediately responded to Fox News’ 의견 요청.

Further complicating the issue, SFLA claims that it was given verbal permission to use tempera paint to create the street mural police officers blocked them from painting. Alaina Gertz, a public affairs specialist with MPD previously told Fox News that it didn’t haveany information to corroborate the statement that the group was told they would not be stopped from painting.

Gertz also said that policedid not issue a permit to put a message on the street. MPD issues permits to assemble. Any markings on the street would have to be permitted by the DC Department of Transportation.

FOX 뉴스 앱을 받으려면 여기를 클릭하십시오.

8 월, video footage emerged showing police warning SFLA members Warner DePriest and Erica Caporaletti that they would be arrested for defacing public property if they continued using sidewalk chalk. But SFLA claimed at the time that sidewalk chalk doesn’t deface public property.

지난 달, SFLA successfully challenged the University of Northern Iowa student government’s decision to block recognition of their groupsimilarly arguing that it experienced viewpoint discrimination.

답장을 남겨주세요

귀하의 이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필요 입력 사항은 표시되어 있습니다 *