Rep. Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, said the internal FBI document, describing the use of what the bureau calls a “threat tag” gemerk “EDUOFFICIAL,” adds to his view that the Garland is using the FBI to improperly target parents who speak out at school board meetings.
“A tag is merely a statistical tool to track information for review and reporting. The creation of a threat tag in no way changes the long-standing requirements for opening an investigation, nor does it represent a shift in how the FBI prioritizes threats The FBI has used tags to track everything from drug trafficking to human trafficking.”
Jordaan, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee
, sent a brief to Garland on Tuesday accusing him of being disingenuous during his testimony on Capitol Hill last month
Jordaan, along with other Republicans, grilled Garland during two separate hearings about the usage of federal resources to create a “snitch line on parents” who are anti-mask advocates or against students in kindergarten through 12th grade from learning about critical race theory.
In the three-page letter, Jordan said that the details in the FBI email “calls into question the accuracy and completeness” of Garland’s testimony about whether counterterrorism tools would be used on behalf of the National School Boards Association (NSBA), which Jordan called a “left-wing special interest group against concerned parents.”
The NSBA wrote a letter to the Biden administration on September 29 asking for help to handle ongoing threats towards educators during school board meetings. Republicans raised eyebrows at the swiftness Garland made to draw up the memo within five days after the NSBA’s request.
Jordan went on to offer Garland the opportunity to amend his statements and reiterated requests for a document dump related to the creation of the October school boards memo “to investigate the matter further.”
Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley declined to comment.
The FBI said its internal memo doesn’t contemplate investigating parents for first amendment protected activities.
“The Attorney General’s memorandum simply underscores the FBI’s ongoing efforts to assist state, plaaslike, and federal partners to address threats of violence, regardless of the motivation,” the bureau statement said. “The FBI has never been in the business of investigating parents who speak out or policing speech at school board meetings, and we are not going to start now.”