Florida judge allows lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito's parents against Brian Laundrie's parents to proceed

A Florida circuit court judge has ruled a lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito’s parents against Brian Laundrie’s parents can move forward.

Circuit Court Judge Hunter Carroll denied a motion from Christopher and Roberta Laundrie, Brian Laundrie’s parents, to dismiss the intentional infliction of emotional distress lawsuit filed by Gabby Petito’s parents, Joseph Petito and Nichole Schmidt.
      말 많은, whose disappearance last summer gripped the nation, was found dead in Wyoming after embarking on a cross-country trip with Brian, who was her fiance. A coroner ruled she died by strangulation. After returning to their Florida home alone and then leaving again, Brian was found dead weeks later. A medical examiner ruled he died by suicide.
        In Thursday’s order, Carroll wrote that most of the complaints from Petito’s parentsinvolves the Laundries failing to act,” such as not telling the parents where Gabby was or that she was dead.
          Carroll wrote if the case was about the Laundries remaining silent and they had done so, he would have ruled for the Laundriesbut they were not silent.
          They released a statement through their attorney on September 14, 2021, 독서, “On behalf of the Laundrie family it is our hope that the search for Miss Petito is successful and that Miss Petito is reunited with her family.
          For purposes of the motion to dismiss, the Court must assume the Laundries are responsible for authoring the September 14, 2021 statement issued by their attorney,” Carroll said.
          The Laundries contend that their statement is not outrageous as a matter of law,” the judge’s statement continued. “At oral argument they suggested it merely was a plain statement. Plaintiffs, in contrast, countered during oral argument the statement knowingly was false, designed to create false hope, and issued by the Laundries who knew Gabby was dead and where her body was located.
          The judge wrote the statement alone was not outrageous, but that threshold was surpassedwhen juxtaposed with the other conduct in the case.
          Petito’s parents claim the Laundries made the statement knowing Gabby was no longer alive, knowing where her body was located and knowing that her parents werefrantically looking for her,” according to their amended complaint.
          If this is true, then the Laundriesstatement was particularly callous and cruel, and it is sufficiently outrageous to state claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress,” Carroll wrote in the order.
          Because the Laundriesstatement by their attorney in the context of the unique facts of this case is objectively outrageous, the Court concludes that Plaintiffs have stated causes of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress against the Laundries. The Court denies the Laundries’ 기각 동의,” the judge wrote.
          Patrick Reilly, the attorney for Petito’s parents, emailed a statement to CNN saying Gabby’s parentsare appreciative of the thorough and well-reasoned decision of Judge Hunter W Carroll.
          Joe and Nichole look forward to discovering the information the Laundries knew about Gabby’s death and her whereabouts, and in particular getting a copy of any correspondence, emails and texts exchanged during the difficult period when Gabby’s whereabouts were unknown,” Reilly said.
            They look forward to going to trial and are confident that ultimately the Laundries will be held accountable. 이때, Joe and Nichole do not wish to discuss this matter publicly and ask that you respect their privacy,” 성명은 읽었다.
            CNN has reached out to the Laundriesattorney for comment.

            댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..