格伦·格林沃尔德(Glenn Greenwald)表示要离开审查制度: ‘尴尬和愤怒’

格伦·格林沃尔德(Glenn Greenwald)表示要离开审查制度: 'Embarrassed and angered'

格伦·格林瓦尔德 opened to塔克·卡尔森今晚Thursday about his decision to walk away from The Interceptthe media outlet he co-foundedand blamed liberal editors whovehemently and enthusiastically support乔·拜登 for censoring an article critical of the Democratic presidential nominee.

Greenwald announced his decision in a scathing blog post that claimed his now-former employer has become “completely unrecognizablebecause it no longer offers a venue for airing dissent, marginalized voices and unheard perspectives.

The reason it was created was to ensure that journalists would always have complete journalistic independence and editorial freedom, never have to pull punches journalistically or pay homage to pieties because of the ideological preferences of editors or of anyone else,” Greenwald told host Tucker Carlson.

That is what makes it so amazing, that the very outlet that I co-createdthat was built on my reputation, my credibility, my journalistic accomplishmentthen tried to intervene to censor me six days before an election because I wanted to publish reporting and analysis about the evidence that raises serious questions about the conduct of the candidate that all of the editors at that outlet vehemently and enthusiastically support.

GLENN GREENWALD QUITS THE INTERCEPT

Greenwald explained that the censored article was “based on recently revealed emails and witness testimony [和] raised critical questions about Biden’s conduct,” a topic that has been largely ignored or dismissed among mainstream media outlets. Greenwald said he isembarrassed and angeredthat his outlet fell for the now-debunked claim that the allegations were a product of Russian disinformation.

“合理的可否认性”: 托尼·伯布林斯基(Tony BOBULINSKI)宣称拜登(BIDEN)家庭对有关风险的担忧已被搁置 2020 出价

The only article I published about all of these documents that have emerged about Joe Biden, other than a column of mine where I denounced Facebook and Twitter for censoring it,” 他说, “was an article that made reference in passing to those documents very snidely and dismissively to say that no one should pay attention to it because it was Russian disinformation and it cited a letter from John Brennan, James Clapperthe rest of the goons from the CIA and intelligence community asserting it.

The Intercept, 除其他事项外, was created to question the assertions of intelligence agencies, who Greenwald accused ofdisseminating propaganda in a very powerful way.

They are authoritarian, they believe in censorship, and they believe in suppression of information that exposes them in any kind of a critical light.

— Glenn Greenwald, ‘塔克·卡尔森今晚’

That letter [signed by Brennan and Clapper] said we have no evidence that Russia is involved in any of this,” 他解释, 但 “The Intercept omitted that phrase, simply cited that letter to try to encourage people to ignore this evidence on the grounds that Russia had manufactured it and that the evidence was fabricated, even though there has never been any evidence that that has been true and everything since has disproven it.

单击此处获取FOX新闻应用程序

Greenwald warned that the CIA, and other intelligence agencies have banded together with mainstream media outlets in support of the Democratic Party, “which is likely to at least take over one branch of government if not all of them in the coming electionand that’s a very alarming proposition.

They are authoritarian, they believe in censorship, and they believe in suppression of information that exposes them in any kind of a critical light.

福克斯新闻’ Brian Flood contributed to this report.

发表评论

您的电子邮件地址不会被公开. 必需的地方已做标记 *

*