Graham, 증가 된 자극 검사 지원: $600 '충분하지 않다’

Graham, 증가 된 자극 검사 지원: $  600 'is not enough'

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman 린지 그레이엄 말했다 “여우 & 친구on Thursday that he supports President Trump on increasing coronavirus stimulus checks to Americans to $ 2,000 ...에서 $ 600 but acknowledged Senate Majority Leader 미치 맥코넬 is right thatthere’s no way to get a vote” 작성자 : Jan. 3.

Graham added thatyou could get a votewith the new Congress.

I think if you had a standalone vote on the $ 2,000 검사 it might pass,” 그는 말했다.

그레이엄, R-S.C., made the comments one day after McConnell, R-Ky., accused top Democrats 낸시 펠로시척 슈머 의 “trying to pull a fast one,warning in a floor speech that there wasno realistic pathto quickly approve larger stimulus checks for Americans contending with the 코로나 바이러스 감염병 세계적 유행.

McConnell accused Pelosi and Schumer of attempting towarpTrump’s call for $ 2,000 direct payments to Americans. The majority leader said the Senate would not separate a vote on $ 2,000 stimulus checks from a bill backed by GOP leaders that includes the establishment of a commission to investigate election fraud and a repeal of 부분 230Communications Decency Act of 1996, the measure which protects social media platforms from liability over third-party posts.

Trump and lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have called on Congress to approve $ 2,000 direct payments, up from the $ 600 checks detailed in a $ 900 billion coronavirus stimulus package approved last week. Earlier this week, McConnell said the Senate wouldbegin a processto consider larger stimulus checks after the body blocked a measure from House Democrats that called for an immediate vote.

목요일에, Graham noted that “70% of Republicans don’t want to go to $ 2,000” becausethey think it’s a $ 430 billion cost to the Treasury.

They think it’s an inefficient way of giving money to people who are hurting because a lot of people making $ 75,000 or less haven’t been out of work,” 그는 계속했다. “But I’m with the president on this.

Graham went on to note that he is in 사우스 캐롤라이나 where the경제 is really hurting.

있습니다 income thresholds that determine who would receive the next full round of stimulus payments, which includes individuals earning up to $ 75,000, 또는 $ 150,000 부부를 위해.


McConnell said Democratic leaders sought to push through a package that would vastly increase the national debt and provide money to families that are not in dire need of aid.

I’d like a standalone vote in the new Congress on the $ 2,000 검사,” 그레이엄이 말했다. “We have seven Republicans who’ve already said they would vote for it. We need five more. I think if we had the vote, we would get there.

He added that he also would liketo vote on repealing Section 230.

The untold story is that Democrats are in the pocket of Big Tech,” 그가 설명했다.

President Trump wants three things: a commission to investigate fraud, $ 2,000 checks and to repeal Section 230,the South Carolina senator noted. “I’m urging Senator McConnell to give a standalone vote in the new Congress after Jan. 3 on all three measures and I would predict that if you had a standalone vote on the $ 2,000 검사, it’s better than 50/50, it would pass.

Democrats have opposed calls for a repeal of Section 230 and the establishment of an election integrity commission.

Graham also acknowledged Thursday that those who oppose increasing the stimulus checks because that would in turn add billions of dollars to the federal debt arenot wrong to be concerned about the expense.

They’re not wrong to be concerned by the fact that this is not the most efficient way,” 그레이엄이 말했다. “There are a lot of people who make $ 75,000 or less a year that work for the government that haven’t been laid off one day, but I’ve seen with my own eyes the destruction of small businesses in South Carolina.

I think a family of four, if they got $ 8,000 dollars, it would help our economy. I think they need the $ 8,000,” 그는 덧붙였다.

Graham went on to say he cannot wait until the vaccine is distributed in large numbers but added thatuntil then our economy is hanging by a thread in South Carolina.

FOX 뉴스 앱을 받으려면 여기를 클릭하십시오.

So to my fiscal conservative friends, I understand your argument, but I think the facts on the ground throughout the country would require us to do more than 600,” 그레이엄이 말했다. “600 is not enough. 2,000 is about right in my opinion and I’m willing to vote.

Fox News’ Thomas Barrabi contributed to this report.

댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..