Hawley는 SCOTUS 낙태 청문회에서 민주당의 수사학이 '정말 위험하다'고 말합니다.

“우리는 이미 민주당원의 수사에서 예측 가능한 증가를 보고 있습니다., 법원이 Roe를 뒤집는 경우 혁명이 어떻게 될 것인지에 대해 민주당 상원 의원을 포함하여,” 그는 폭스 뉴스에 말했다. “This is really inappropriate and dangerous rhetoric.

Really dangerous,” 그는 덧붙였다.

이것의. 조쉬 홀리, (R-MO) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to examine Texas's abortion law on Capitol Hill on September 29, 2021 워싱턴, DC.

이것의. 조쉬 홀리, (R-MO) speaks during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to examine Texas’s abortion law on Capitol Hill on September 29, 2021 워싱턴, DC. (Photo by Tom Williams-Pool/Getty Images)

BIDEN REACTS TO SUPREME COURT ABORTION CASE, SAYS HE STILL SUPPORTS ROE V. 걸어 건너기

The senator’s comments were in response to a prediction made by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., who said there would be a “혁명” if the high court repealed the 1973 landmark decision made in Roe v. 걸어 건너기.

I hope the Supreme Court is listening to the people of the United States,” Shaheen said 월요일. “I think if you want to see a revolution go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is of the public, particularly young people.

Because I think that will not be acceptable to young women or young men,” 그녀는 덧붙였다.

Fox News could not immediately reach Shaheen for comment, but tough questioning by certain justices on the Supreme Court Wednesday in the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health could spell trouble for proponents of Roe v. 걸어 건너기.

그만큼 1973 decision made its way back to the Supreme Court this week when the constitutionality of a 2018 Mississippi law banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy was contested.

Democrats have long argued that the near 50-year precedent established under Roe v. Wade federally secures a women’s right to access an abortion and should not be reversed.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh pushed back on the argument for stare decisis — the principle that the court should stick to its past rulings — and suggested some of the nation’s most significant cases were repeals.

댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..