赫格塞斯: Pentagon's Gilday 'infected' ensigns' reading list with activist book by 'anti-racist' Kendi

One week after Rep. 吉姆·班克斯, 果皮。, challenged Admiral Michael Gilday on the inclusion of Ibram X. Kendi’sHow to Be an Anti-Raciston the list of recommended reading for sailors and ensigns, 它的. 汤姆·科顿, R-方舟, – himself a veteran of Operation Iraqi Freedom – called on Gilday to explain further.

I want to give you a sampling of some things included in books like this, the notion that capitalism is racist and racism is capitalist [然后] the only remedy for past discrimination is present discrimination – How do these books get on your reading list?” Cotton asked Gilday Monday.

Gilday responded that the death of 乔治·弗洛伊德 and other related events make itclearly obviousthat the discussions about racism arestill a painful part of our cultureand must be better understood through the writings of Kendi and others. He added that he does not agree with every assertion that Kendi, WHO holds a doctorate in African-American studies from Temple University, 使.

Cotton had previously labeled Kendi a “舞弊” after he made a racially-charged criticism of then-Supreme Court nominee 艾米·康尼·巴雷特 – who has 2 adopted Ethiopian children — 在 2020.

赫格塞斯, who is also a veteran, told host Martha MacCallum that Kendi’s work hasabsolutely no relevanceto the cohesion of the military or its ability to defend America and fight in wars.

He said that a key element of the U.S. military’s basic training has always been to level the field and make each ensign or soldier equal – no matter their historical circumstances or immutable characteristics.

When you go to basic training … you are broken down to say the superficial differences don’t matter when we come together as a team to close with and destroy the enemy,” 他说.

In the Navy’s case, as we try to maintain global dominance on the high seas, all it has to do with is catering to the latest fads of the current administrationwhich is trying to push these theories throughout government.

During the previous hearing, when he was challenged by Banks, Gilday testified 那 “there is racism in the Navy just as there is racism in our country”.

Hegseth said that the military has always been ameritocracywhere a person’s worth is determined by their performance, not other concerns.

While he characterized the Navy as now “已感染” with an activist reading list, Hegseth said the U.S. Army’s reading curriculum has yet to becrackedby purported “反种族主义” 情绪.

But the Navy and the chief of naval operations (Gilday) 有, and it’s bad for the sailors and ensigns,” 他说.

Hegseth added that, since the Capitol riot on January 6, a military working group continues to vet recruits to essentially determine their personal political persuasions.

Winning wars, saving lives, being there for the men on the right and the left of you. Selflessness is required. Unit cohesion is required. Knowing your buddy will be there for you in that critical is required. The only thing that matters is whether they’re a member of your team or squad; I’m talking in an Infantry context,” 他说.

Your platoon or your company and what they’ll be doing in those decisive moments and how trained and well-prepared they are.

Hegseth noted that the 海军 is not infallible and that the Pentagon should be more focused on bettering its operational abilities in those arenas, pointing in one instance to the 2016 capture of U.S. sailors by Iranian authorities.

Remember when we surrendered to the Iranian fishing boat? There have been plenty of mistakes from the Navy,” said Hegseth.

What about rising powers like 中国 who want to exploit sea power to expand their orbit of control? I don’t understand how you can think these types of things are good when you’ve had enough missteps and a huge challenge on your hands with the threat the Navy is facing.

评论被关闭.