メディアが議事妨害の議論に誤解を招くような物語をどのように推し進めるか

上院議事妨害討論のニュース報道は、この問題に関する民主党の最近の偽善を省略または軽視することが多く、議事妨害が上院で果たす役割をアメリカ人に知らせることができません。, according to Thomas Jipping, a senior legal fellow for the Heritage Foundation.

I think many people get the impression that this is a new innovation that, ええと, Republicans came up with just recently to stymie Democrats from doing what they want to do,” said Jipping, who worked as a staffer for former Sen. オリンハッチ, R-ユタ, にとって 15 年. “But I think the media would serve the country better by a little bit of a civics lesson that the Senate is designed to handle legislation differently than the House and the requirement of a supermajority to end debate, even though a simple majority can still pass bills.

代わりに, much of the coverage of the filibuster framing the debate mimics Democratic and liberal talking points. 例えば, the media often frames how eliminating the filibuster is necessary to save democracy in the United States.

ブラックバーン: DEMOCRATS DEPLOYING ‘LEGISLATIVE TRICKERY’ TO PUSH THROUGH VOTING BILL

その. キルステンシネマ, D-アリゾナ。, delivers remarks on the Senate floor in support of the legislative filibuster, 木曜日に, 1月. 13, 2022.

その. キルステンシネマ, D-アリゾナ。, delivers remarks on the Senate floor in support of the legislative filibuster, 木曜日に, 1月. 13, 2022.

コメントは締め切りました.