판사는 트럼프 캠페인에 반대한다 6 부재자 투표에 대한 펜실베니아 사건

금요일 펜실베이니아에서 두 명의 판사가 트럼프 캠페인이 필라델피아 주변에서 수천 표를 무효화하기 위해 가져온 6 건의 법원 사건을 기각했습니다., where voters carried President-elect Joe Biden to a clear win in the battleground state.

전체적으로, the Trump campaign had sought to throw out almost 9,000 absentee ballots because their outer envelopes lack names, dates or addresses or some combination of the three that voters could have filled out.
In five related cases, Judge James Crumlish of Philadelphia County’s Court of Common Pleas said the Trump campaign couldn’t invalidate 8,329 ballots it alleged were improper. The judge ruled those ballots should be processed and counted.
다른 경우, the President’s campaign sought for the Montgomery County Board of Elections to throw out 592 mail-in ballots where voters hadn’t filled out their addresses on the outside envelopes. Those ballots will be counted, the second judge, Richard Haaz of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, ruled on Friday.
    Haaz found that state law didn’t require voters to fill out the address sections on the envelopes, and the instructions on the ballots didn’t tell voters they must fill them out.
    Voters should not be disenfranchised by reasonably relying upon voting instructions provided by election officials,” Haaz wrote.
      The Trump campaign had said in court that it wasn’t alleging voting fraud in the casesjust attempting to enforce the rules.
      Though the ballots numbered in the thousands, they would not be enough for Trump to overcome Biden’s win in Pennsylvania, even if all were Trump votes.

      답장을 남겨주세요

      귀하의 이메일 주소는 공개되지 않습니다. 필요 입력 사항은 표시되어 있습니다 *

      *