Thomas — to steal a word from the Gen Z culture — is now an influencer.
At an event Thursday night, hosted by The Heritage Foundation to celebrate his legacy, Thomas addressed a crowd of the conservative faithful, referencing his more difficult days, and thanking those who had helped him.
He said it was “an absolute joy” to be able to “celebrate this moment, not because of me, but because of you all and what we are trying to defend in this great country.”
He was introduced by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, who called Thomas a “legal titan.”
McConnell was largely responsible for pushing through President Donald Trump’s nominees on the bench, infuriating liberals by blocking President Barack Obama’s nominee citing the then-upcoming presidential election, but then orchestrating the nomination of Justice Amy Coney Barrett right before Trump lost. He called Thomas the “brightest possible North Star.”
“At the risk of sounding greedy,” McConnell gesê, “we’d like 30 more years.”
Thomas said he was a “little embarrassed” by the attention because he’s a “100% introvert” and he thanked “countless people I did not know” — hulle roep “angels in a very very dark time.”
“I appreciate the senators who voted for me, almal 52 van hulle,” Thomas said to laughter. “Hey all you need is 50.”
(Thomas was confirmed by a
52-48 vote in
1991 after his nomination was very nearly derailed after sexual harassment allegations by Heuwel
, his former employee at the Department of Education and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
His remarks came after top appellate lawyers and judges — many of them former clerks — from the highest echelons of the judiciary came together in Washington to fete Thomas — only the second African American to serve on the court — and his legacy.
Panelists at the event discussed his views on the First Amendment, religion and race, as well as his efforts to limit the power of federal agencies and the so-called “administrative state.” They praised his adherence to the judicial philosophy called “originalism” and his strongly held belief that the court is not always bound by past precedent, even if a decision has been on the books for decades.
After the event he headed back to work to deal with a late-night death penalty application that was still pending.
It’s too early for any full opinions this term
, maar behind the scenes
, assignments have begun
. Because of his seniority
, when Roberts is in dissent and Thomas is in the majority
, it is Thomas who will assign the opinion
. That fact alone
, could shape the Chief Justice’s thinking going forward
Op September 1, a 5-4 vote created a firestorm across the country, by allowing a Texas six-week abortion ban to go into effect pending appeal, nearly nullifying Roe v. Wade in that state. In Desember, the court will also take up a Mississippi law that bars most abortions after 15 weke. The state is asking the court to overturn Roe — the landmark decision that has been on the books for nearly 50 jare.
Thomas’ vote is not in doubt. In Junie 2020, byvoorbeeld, he wrote that Roe is “grievously wrong.”
Op Donderdag, McConnell praised Thomas jurisprudence in the area.
“Take his jurisprudence on unborn life,” McConnell gesê. “Every time without fail, Justice Thomas writes a separate, concise opinion to cut through the 50-year tangle of made up tests and shifting standards and calmly reminds everybody that the whole house of cards lacks a constitutional foundation,” hy het gesê.
The justices will also take on a Second Amendment case, hearing arguments in November.
Back in in 2008 in District of Columbia v. Heller, the court held for the first time that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms at home for self-defense. Except for a follow-up decision two years later, the justices have largely stayed away from the issue — infuriating gun rights advocates and even some of the justices themselves.
In 2017, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, Thomas expressed his frustration. “I find it extremely improbable that the Framers understood the Second Amendment to protect little more than carrying a gun from the bedroom to the kitchen,” hy het geskryf.
For years Thomas has urged his colleagues to take up another case, and now they have.
This term, the court will consider New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, concerning a New York law that restricts individuals from carrying a concealed handgun in public.
It requires a resident to obtain a license to carry a concealed pistol or revolver and demonstrate that “proper cause” exists for the permit. Residents must show that they have a great need for the license and that they face a “special or unique danger to their life.”
Justices may also take up a case concerning affirmative action, if not this term, maybe next. In 2013, Thomas made his views on that issue clear. A “state’s use of race in higher education admission decisions is categorically prohibited by the Equal Protection Clause,” hy het gesê.
Former clerks having a major influence in the judiciary
At the Heritage event, Thomas clerks pointed to Thomas’ pattern, like in the Affirmative Action case, to express his views and hope that they will one day become majority opinions.
Judge Allison Jones Rushing, a Trump nominee to the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals and a former Thomas clerk, dedicated her discussion to Thomas’ invloed.
“He has persuaded his colleagues to come along
,” sy het gese, even as recently as last term in a case where a
, divided along familiar ideological lines
, invalidated a California rule that requires charitable organizations to disclose the names of contributors
. The case had been closely watched by supporters of campaign finance reform who believe the ruling could eventually lead more anonymous money to enter the political sphere
. Thomas concurred in the decision saying that the
“right to assemble
” includes the right to
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the main onenigheid for her liberal colleagues
. “That disclosure requirements directly burden associational rights has been the view of Justice Thomas
, but it has never been the view of the Court
“sy het gese.
It’s no surprise that another former clerk, William Consovoy, is also the lead lawyer behind the affirmative action challenge making its way to the high court concerning Harvard’s admission policies. Consovoy also served as President Donald Trump’s lawyer when he attempted to block a subpoena from New York state prosecutors for his tax returns.
Tydens die Trump-administrasie, several former Thomas clerks held high positions.
Both Neomi Rao and Gregory Katsas worked in the executive branch, and then they were appointed to serve on a powerful appeals court in Washington, DC.
Jeffrey Wall served as acting solicitor general for the Trump administration and argued in favor of Trump’s controversial travel ban. Another Trump nominee, James Ho, sits on the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals and voted to allow the Texas six-week abortion ban go into effect. Two high-level sources say that if Trump had had the opportunity to appoint another Supreme Court justice, Ho would have been high on the list.
And Carrie Severino is the president of the Judicial Crisis Network, a group that played a significant role supporting the Trump administration’s nominees.
Donderdagaand, Thomas thanked them all. “I love my kids,” hy het gesê. “These are my kids, they spend a year of their lives with me and they never get away. I love being a part of their lives.”
But as many of his former clerks are moving forward to shape the law, Thomas is still laying the groundwork for issues he hopes one day will garner a majority.
He has called
, byvoorbeeld, vir die reconsideration of a landmark First Amendment case, New York Times v. Sullivan
, labeling it a policy-driven decision
“masquerading as constitutional law.
” He’s suggested that Congress weigh whether laws should be updated to better regulate social media platforms
En in 2019, he explained his thinking about an Indiana abortion law that made it illegal for a doctor to perform an abortion motivated solely by the race, seks, diagnosis of Down syndrome or disability of the fetus. The court said it would leave in place a lower court opinion that had invalidated that provision of the law, volgende “our ordinary practice” of denying petitions that raise legal issues that have not been considered by other court of appeals.
In a concurring opinion
, Thomas agreed with the court’s decision to decline to
“take up the issue now.
” But he went on to warn his colleagues about the potential for abortion “to become a tool of eugenic manipulation.
” He said the court
“will soon need to confront the constitutionality of laws like Indiana’s.
Opmerklik, this April a federal appeals court upheld an Ohio law that prohibits a doctor from performing an abortion when the doctor knows the reason is because of a fetal diagnosis of Down syndrome. The judges did not all agree on the reasoning, but laced within the 111 pages were references to eugenics, and Thomas’ opinie.