Justice Kavanaugh delivers blistering opinion after SCOTUS ruling: 'The NCAA is not above the law'

Kavanaugh gave the concurring opinion after Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the initial opinion. He said the NCAA’s compensation rules raiseserious questions under antitrust lawsand gave three points on the matter. He went against the NCAA’s argument that the lack of compensation levels the playing field. He wrote the NCAA’s argument wascircular and unpersuasiveand the organization was engaged inprice-fixing laborand called the matter atextbook antitrust problem.

单击此处获取更多体育报道 .

The bottom line is that the NCAA and its member colleges are suppressing the pay of student athletes who collectively generate billions of dollars in revenues for colleges every year. Those enormous sums of money flow to seemingly everyone except the student athletes. College presidents, athletic directors, coaches, conference commissioners, and NCAA executives take in six- and seven-figure salaries. Colleges build lavish new facilities. But the student athletes who generate the revenues, many of whom are African American and from lower-income backgrounds, end up with little or nothing,” 他写了.

In conclusion, Kavanaugh noted the longstanding traditions in the NCAA could not disqualify the organization from any potential antitrust issues.

SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH STUDENT ATHLETES, RULES NCAA IMPROPERLY CAPPED EDUCATION-RELATED BENEFITS

To be sure, the NCAA and its member colleges maintain important traditions that have become part of the fabric of America—game days in Tuscaloosa and South Bend; the packed gyms in Storrs and Durham; the women’s and men’s lacrosse championships on Memorial Day weekend; track and field meets in Eugene; the spring softball and baseball World Series in Oklahoma City and Omaha; the list goes on. But those traditions alone cannot justify the NCAA’s decision to build a massive money-raising enterprise on the backs of student athletes who are not fairly compensated. Nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate. And under ordinary principles of antitrust law, it is not evident why college sports should be any different. The NCAA is not above the law.

Kavanaugh’s critique of the NCAA was a topic of conversation on social media.

The NCAA sent a statement to its member schools across all divisions, 根据 The Athletic.

Even though the decision does not directly address name, 图像和肖像, the NCAA remains committed to supporting NIL benefits for student-athletes,” NCAA President Mark Emmert said. “另外, we remain committed to working with Congress to chart a path forward, which is a point the Supreme Court expressly stated in its ruling.

Fox News’ Ronn Blitzer contributed to this report.

评论被关闭.