Kilmeade: Leak of Supreme Court draft opinion 'suspicious'

BRIAN KILMEADE: It’s the first time a draft opinion has been leaked in the history of the Supreme Court. It’s a big deal. There’s a leaker in the highest court. Who is behind it? For some reason, top Democrats refused to call it a leak. They’re calling it a “report.” 

CAIN: FAUCI MADE IT UNMASKED TO BEFORE AND AFTER PARTIES, BUT MISSED WHITE HOUSE DINNER

Well. Clinton’s former campaign press secretary called the leaker “brave” while a senior correspondent at Vox – V-O-X – says, “I’m glad it leaked because the leak will foster anger and distrust with the irredeemable institution that is the Supreme Court.” Irredeemable? Really? This leak appears to be politically motivated. The timing is suspicious. The draft was written in February, oral arguments in December. Midterms are right around the corner. Today, matter of fact, in Ohio and Indiana, every poll forecasts the Democrats are going to take a shellacking of a lifetime in November. So they change the narrative, right? Now, the media stops talking about inflation, [and] instead focuses on scaring you. 

WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 19:  Pro-life activists try to block the sign of a pro-choice activist during the 2018 March for Life January 19, 2018 in Washington, DC. Activists gathered in the nation's capital for the annual event to protest the anniversary of the Supreme Court Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion in 1973.  (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON, DC – JANUARY 19:  Pro-life activists try to block the sign of a pro-choice activist during the 2018 March for Life January 19, 2018 in Washington, DC. Activists gathered in the nation’s capital for the annual event to protest the anniversary of the Supreme Court Roe v. Wade ruling that legalized abortion in 1973.  (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Comments are closed.