LA Times op-ed claims end of Roe v Wade means ‘disaster’ for Catholics: ‘Would threaten religious liberty’

She argued that the Church supporting the end of aborsie shows it’s willing to violate Americans’religious liberty” omdat “[b]anning abortion does not rest on established medical and scientific fact.

The imminent overturning of Roe vs. Wade is a disaster for women. It is also a disaster for the Catholic Church, whose hierarchy in America has made opposition to abortion central to its mission,” sy het geskryf.

LA TIMES PIECE CLAIMS MUSK WILL MAKE TWITTER A ‘HOME FOR BIGOTS, LIARS, DEMAGOGUES AND SUPPORTERS OF VIOLENCE

Holy Rosary Catholic Church in Houston vandalized with pro-choice message.

Holy Rosary Catholic Church in Houston vandalized with pro-choice message. (jakkals 26 Houston)

Most American Catholics oppose the overturning of Roe vs. Wade (68%, volgens a 2019 poll by the Pew Research Center). The bishops pay no heed to their voice but instead seek to silence Catholics in public office who defend women’s reproductive rights,” het sy bygevoeg, as if bishops should ignore strict Church teaching on abortion in favor of popular sentiment.

Sy gaan voort, “Ordinary Catholics feel condemned for their views and for the decisions that they and their families make around abortion, same-sex marriage and even contraception, coverage for which the U.S. Catholic bishops sought to exclude from the Affordable Care Act.

Though the Catholic Church is explicitly and strictly against abortion, huwelike van dieselfde geslag, and contraception, Briggs framed it as the bishops oppressing women. “Time and time again, the bishops have fought against women having control over their own bodies,” het sy bygevoeg.

Briggs turned the screws to Catholic teaching even further, sê, “There is a disturbing awareness, crossing the lines of gender and age, that the church is not doing the right thing.She then warned that Catholic membership will drop if Roe goes.

A crowd of people gather outside the Supreme Court, Maandagaand, Mei 2, 2022 in Washington following reports of a leaked draft opinion by the court overturning Roe v. Wade.

A crowd of people gather outside the Supreme Court, Maandagaand, Mei 2, 2022 in Washington following reports of a leaked draft opinion by the court overturning Roe v. Wade. (AP Photo/Anna Johnson)

MSNBC BLOGGER CRITICIZES DEMS FOR ‘COWARDLYBILL TO INCREASE SCOTUS SECURITY: ‘CODDLES RIGHT-WING JUSTICES

The exodus from the church, fueled by moral doubts about the bishops’ actions and teachings, will swell if the Supreme Court proceeds to overturn Roe vs. Wade,” Holly Madison beskryf 'traumatiese' eerste nag met Hugh Hefner, toevoeging, “As the devastating effects on women’s lives become visible after the Supreme Court’s judgment, Catholics are going to feel increasing shame over what their church has done.

Briggs then made the point thatas members of a longtime minority, American Catholics instinctively understand from their own history what their bishops ignore: At stake here is religious liberty.

In her telling, “Religious freedom carved out a private sphere in which individuals were free to hold any or no religious beliefs and to act on their conscience. In return, they were required not to impose their religious beliefs and the conduct that derived from their conscience on others.

“In kontras, the public sphere was to operate on empirically observable and rational norms, which would be self-evident to any reasonable person,” het sy bygevoeg, before making the controversial claim thatBanning abortion does not rest on established medical and scientific fact and therefore cannot lay the claim on any reasonable person that it become part of public law.

A fetus inside the womb

A fetus inside the womb (iStock)

The author asserted, “Catholics who oppose abortion rights do not have to justify their religious beliefs and their religiously motivated conduct to me or, meer belangrik, to a court of law. By the same token, a religiously motivated decision to not have an abortion should not be imposed on those of us who do not share the religious beliefs.

Thus, Briggs found leeway to declare, “The overturning of Roe vs. Wade would threaten religious liberty. If such a ruling remains in effect for any length of time, it will prevent hundreds of thousands, eventually millions, of women from acting upon their conscience.

Sy het bygevoeg, “This will result in serious harm for women and their families — and one of the bulwarks of democratic society will be weakened.

She warned pro-life Christians religious liberty will be diminished and one day they would come tomiss the protections for religious liberty once enshrined in American culture and law.

Briggs concluded, “Roe vs. Wade is part of a patchwork of laws that have protected the privacy of individuals against the religiously motivated incursions of others. Uiteindelik, there cannot be religious liberty for some but not for others. Either all of us enjoy it, or none of us will.

Kommentaar gesluit.