I legislatori reagiscono al caso di aborto della Corte Suprema del Mississippi

Lo stato del Mississippi ha davvero certamente condotto una lotta coraggiosa per assicurarsi che questi siano decisi a livello statale, che questo genere di cose è deciso dai funzionari eletti, non la Corte Suprema,” rappresentante. Michelle Fischbach, a Minnesota Repubblicano, ha detto a Fox News.

And Michigan Democrat Rep. Haley Stevens noted: We don’t need the Supreme Court intervening between a woman and her doctor.

WATCH NOW:

NEW YORK DEM SAYS WE ARE NOT ‘IN A DEMOCRACYWITHOUT ABORTION

Repubblicano. Jodey Arrington had a similar opinion on the Supreme Court’s role in the matter.

The important issue is you will not have the Supreme Court setting the supreme law of the land of where states can restrict abortions,” the Texan told Fox News.

Pro-abortion rights activist Alicia Hurt holds a placard during a protest outside the Supreme Court building, ahead of arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, a Washington, Dic. 1, 2021.

Pro-abortion rights activist Alicia Hurt holds a placard during a protest outside the Supreme Court building, ahead of arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, a Washington, Dic. 1, 2021. (REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein)

The Supreme Court heard a case Wednesday regarding a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 settimane. Il caso, Dobbs v. Jackson, could upend Roe v. Guadare, which in 1973 granted women the constitutional right to abortions during the first two trimesters of pregnancy.

“Dopo 50 years of the tragic Roe vs. Wade case … the court is willing to take a look now and finally catch up with the new technology, the ultrasound, the fact that we know that babies are kicking, that the viability is going lower and lower week-wise every year,” Fischbach said.

rappresentante. Michelle Fischbach

rappresentante. Michelle Fischbach

I commenti sono chiusi.