議員はミシシッピ州最高裁判所の中絶事件に反応する

ミシシッピ州は、これらが州レベルで決定されることを確実にするために、確かに勇気ある戦いを主導してきました, この種のことは選出された役人によって決定されること, 最高裁判所ではありません,” 担当者. Michelle Fischbach, a Minnesota 共和党, フォックスニュースに語った.

And Michigan Democrat Rep. Haley Stevens noted: We don’t need the Supreme Court intervening between a woman and her doctor.

WATCH NOW:

NEW YORK DEM SAYS WE ARE NOT ‘IN A DEMOCRACYWITHOUT ABORTION

共和党議員. Jodey Arrington had a similar opinion on the Supreme Court’s role in the matter.

The important issue is you will not have the Supreme Court setting the supreme law of the land of where states can restrict abortions,” the Texan told Fox News.

Pro-abortion rights activist Alicia Hurt holds a placard during a protest outside the Supreme Court building, ahead of arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, ワシントンで, 12月. 1, 2021.

Pro-abortion rights activist Alicia Hurt holds a placard during a protest outside the Supreme Court building, ahead of arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, ワシントンで, 12月. 1, 2021. (ロイター/イブリン・ホックスタイン)

The Supreme Court heard a case Wednesday regarding a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 週. ケース, ドブスv. ジャクソン, could upend Roe v. ウェイド, which in 1973 granted women the constitutional right to 中絶 during the first two trimesters of pregnancy.

“後 50 years of the tragic Roe vs. Wade case … the court is willing to take a look now and finally catch up with the new technology, the ultrasound, the fact that we know that babies are kicking, that the viability is going lower and lower week-wise every year,” Fischbach said.

担当者. Michelle Fischbach

担当者. Michelle Fischbach

コメントは締め切りました.