立法者对密西西比州最高法院堕胎案的反应

密西西比州确实领导了一场勇敢的斗争,以确保这些是在州一级决定的, 这种事情是由民选官员决定的, 不是最高法院,” 代表. 米歇尔·菲施巴赫, a Minnesota 共和党人, 告诉福克斯新闻.

And Michigan Democrat Rep. Haley Stevens noted: We don’t need the Supreme Court intervening between a woman and her doctor.

WATCH NOW:

NEW YORK DEM SAYS WE ARE NOT ‘IN A DEMOCRACYWITHOUT ABORTION

共和党代表. Jodey Arrington had a similar opinion on the Supreme Court’s role in the matter.

The important issue is you will not have the Supreme Court setting the supreme law of the land of where states can restrict abortions,” the Texan told Fox News.

Pro-abortion rights activist Alicia Hurt holds a placard during a protest outside the Supreme Court building, ahead of arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case Dobbs v. 杰克逊女性健康, 在华盛顿, 十二月. 1, 2021.

Pro-abortion rights activist Alicia Hurt holds a placard during a protest outside the Supreme Court building, ahead of arguments in the Mississippi abortion rights case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, 在华盛顿, 十二月. 1, 2021. (路透社/伊夫林霍克斯坦)

The Supreme Court heard a case Wednesday regarding a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 周. 案子, 多布斯诉. 杰克逊, could upend Roe v. 韦德, which in 1973 granted women the constitutional right to abortions during the first two trimesters of pregnancy.

“后 50 years of the tragic Roe vs. Wade case … the court is willing to take a look now and finally catch up with the new technology, the ultrasound, the fact that we know that babies are kicking, that the viability is going lower and lower week-wise every year,” 菲施巴赫说.

代表. 米歇尔·菲施巴赫

代表. 米歇尔·菲施巴赫

评论被关闭.