Kirby, told Fox News on Monday that the current troops are part of what would be the U.S.’ contribution to NATO, and that they would not be sent directly into Ukraine but instead to any number of neighboring countries that are currently NATO members.
NATO members Romania, Hungary, Slovakia and Poland all neighbor Ukraine to the west or southwest, while Latvia, Estonia and Norway directly border Russia.
“[NATO has] a 40,000-force-strong response force. Some of it would be in a very-ready task force of about 20,000. So most of these troops would be our contribution. 美国’ contribution to this NATO readiness force that would be on sort of a high alert inside the alliance,” 他说, reiterating that there has been no deployment order and that the announcement is somewhat of a precaution.
“All we’re doing today, 玛莎, is telling these units you need to get ready and you need to be ready to go on a shorter timeline than maybe you were before. No deployment orders have been signed today,” Kirby said. “They’re not leaving the United States today or in the imminent future, but we want to make sure that they’re ready in case they’re asked.”
“这些 [我们。] 军队, if activated by the alliance, not by the United States … would go to NATO’s allies, mostly on the eastern flank of the alliance, [WHO] would want that kind of capability, additional robust defensive capability inside their borders,” Kirby said.
MacCallum countered that sending American troops to the Eastern front wouldn’t necessarily deter Putin from once again invading Ukraine, as he would then not be met immediately by Western forces.
“But that wouldn’t prevent Vladimir Putin from going into Ukraine, just because there are troops that are positioned in other countries around there, and especially when he knows — and has been told by the White House – that no U.S. troops are going to enter Ukraine,” MacCallum responded.
Kirby replied that Biden has promised “severe economic consequences” if Putin makes an incursion into the former Soviet state, and that Western allies are ready to join in that response.
“We don’t we don’t know exactly what Mr. Putin has in mind, but this is designed to make sure that we are meeting our commitments to the NATO’s alliance,” 他说.
Biden previously came under fire for comments made during last week’s press conference in which the president said “it depends on what [俄国] 确实,” while making reference to a potential “轻微入侵” versus a full-scale invasion.
Those comments were met with a strong rebuke from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, 谁说 “there are no minor incursions” when it comes to an independent country like his.
“What President Biden has made clear is that there will be severe economic consequences if [普京] does make another incursion into Ukraine, and the international community will respond as well,” Kirby said. “The purpose of these troops is to bolster and reassure our NATO allies, and that’s what they will be going to do.”
MacCallum went on to note that in Kyiv itself, the State Department has already ordered some embassy staff to begin booking private airfare out of the country, which some observers noted may be to avoid any panicked last-minute evacuations as seen last August in Kabul, 阿富汗.
Kirby said there are no plans to involve the U.S. military in any such evacuations from Kiev.
MacCallum reiterated how the potential movement of troops into the region may not be a strong enough deterrent for aggressive Kremlin action: