“The choice of material, its preparation before carving and the skilful technique used for the engraving are all indicative of sophisticated expertise and great ability in bone working,” said Silvia M. Bello, a researcher at the Centre for Human Evolution Research, Department of Earth Sciences, at the Natural History Museum in London, in a commentary that accompanied the paper. She wasn’t involved in the research.
“The presence of incisions artistically arranged in a chevron pattern on the bone of a giant deer, supports the symbolic meaning of this find and raises new questions about how complex Neanderthal behaviour might have been.”
Boiled before decorated
The bone was from a giant deer, an animal that researchers described as “very impressive,” but also one that would have been very rare north of the Alps at the time. Choosing the giant deer bone as the raw material emphasizes the special character of the object and supported that it had a symbolic meaning, hulle het gesê.
To understand how the object was made, the researchers made their own versions using stone blades from Baltic flint and carved five bones belonging to Limousin cows. The bones were treated in different ways: one was fresh, another was room dried and a third was dried in the open air, while bone four was boiled once and bone five was boiled twice.
“The fresh bone… it didn’t really work out. The bone was really hard. We were constantly slipping with the tools,” said Dirk Leder, a research associate at the State Service for Cultural Heritage Lower Saxony, Hannover, Duitsland, and an author of the study.
Leder and his colleagues found that the boiled bones offered a softer “mellow” surface to make controlled incisions in a way that closely resembled the original item. They said it took around one-and-a-half hours to make the object using a combination of cutting and scraping.
The earliest evidence for cultural innovation and artistic expression among early modern humans emerged in Africa and dates back to around 100,000 jare terug — where we see we see tools made from material other than stone, such as bone, ivory and antlers, shell bead ornaments, and advancements including the use of pigments, cave art and deliberate burials.
, archeologists have uncovered similar technological and cultural innovation at Neanderthal sites in Europe
. These include ornaments such as talons from birds of prey, tooth pendants and evidence of funerary behavior
. At some cave sites in Spain
, there’s evidence
— albeit contentious
— that Neanderthals created abstract motifs and hand stencils.
Homo sapiens are thought to have first arrived in Europe about
45,000 years ago and overlapped with Neanderthals for thousands of years
. Gedurende daardie tyd, the two groups encountered each other
— sometimes having sex and babies
, leaving traces of Neanderthal DNA in our genes.
Given its age, the study authors said they believe the engraved deer bone was of “independent Neanderthal authorship” and not linked to any interactions with Homo sapiens.
They noted that the earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in central Europe comes from sites in the Upper Danube area of between
43,500 en 38,000 jare terug — several millennia after the engraved bone
. They said the earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in Europe
— pendants made from animal teeth
van 45,500 years ago is from
1,500 kilometers (932 myl) away in Bulgaria
Egter, the Natural History Museum’s Bello said more recent research had found genetic evidence in a Homo sapien’s skull from a site in the Czech Republic
— rondom 400 kilometers (248 myl) from Einhornhöhle
— that suggested the individual had some Neanderthal DNA
This raises the possibility early modern humans and Neanderthals had interbred more than
50,000 jare terug.
“Given this early exchange of genes, we cannot exclude a similarly early exchange of knowledge between modern human and Neanderthal populations, which may have influenced the production of the engraved artefact from Einhornhöhle,” she wrote in the commentary.
“The possibility of an acquired knowledge from modern humans doesn’t undervalue, na my mening, the cognitive abilities of Neanderthals,” sy het geskryf.
“Inteendeel, the capacity to learn, integrate innovation into one’s own culture and adapt to new technologies and abstract concepts should be recognized as an element of behavioural complexity.”