뉴욕 타임즈 이사, Kyrsten Sinema, 민주당 탈당 촉구, 독립하다

안에 Friday op-ed, Cottle cited the moderate Democrat’s split with others in her party on major issues related to President 조 바이든의 Build Back Better agenda as reason she should consider leaving, and suggested her departure could wind upbeing positive for all involved.

Cottle wrote that progressives remained angry at Sinema over what they saw asbetrayalswhen she decided to oppose an increase in the minimum wage and support maintaining the Senate filibuster rule. She added that Sinema might be on the same path to abandon her “팀” altogether, listing past senators who switched parties during their terms.

WASHINGTON, DC - 십월 06: 이것의. 커스틴 시네마 (D-AZ) attends a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee meeting to discuss committee matters on Capitol Hill on October워싱턴WaDCington, DC. The committee met to discuss topics including amendments to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and to vote on several nominations to security posts. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

워싱턴, DC – 십월 06: 이것의. 커스틴 시네마 (D-AZ) attends a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee meeting to discuss committee matters on Capitol Hill on October 06, 2021 워싱턴, DC. The committee met to discuss topics including amendments to the Inspector General Act of 1978 and the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and to vote on several nominations to security posts. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images) (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

LIBERAL ACTIVISTS PLAN ON ‘BIRD-DOGGING’ KYRSTEN SINEMA AT BOSTON MARATHON

She referenced the harassment Sinema had received from protestors since announcing her opposition to the massive Democrat-backed $ 3.5 trillion spending bill still being negotiated in Congress, and claimed that people didn’t have a clear sense of what her principles actually were, or what mattered to her.

Some have suggested that she’s charting a path out of office entirely. But Ms. Sinema’s better course may be not to leave the Senate but to split with her party. Her departure might even wind up being a positive for all involved,” 그녀가 적었다.

US Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) wearing a mask to protect herself and others from COVID-19, known as coronavirus, leaves following a vote at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, 할 수있다 4, 2020. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

US Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) wearing a mask to protect herself and others from COVID-19, known as coronavirus, leaves following a vote at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, 할 수있다 4, 2020. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images) (게티)

Cottle wrote that Sinema joining the Republican Party would bea bridge too farbecause she wasn’tan actual conservative,” but that easing into becoming an independent would beless disruptive.

She suggested that Sinema could be an independent senator but still caucus with Democrats, much like Sen. 버니 샌더스, I-Vt., and Sen. Angus King, I-Maine.

A split still wouldn’t be easy. The logistics would be a nightmare. And while open relationships often sound great in theory, they can be excruciating to navigate,” Cottle wrote. “But Ms. Sinema has a better shot than most at not just surviving such a shift, but becoming a truly independent force to be reckoned with — maybe even a power broker for years to come.

팔월 4, 2021 - 워싱턴, DC, 미국: 우리. Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) 상원 국토안보 및 정부 업무 위원회 회의에서 연설. (Michael Brochstein / Sipa USA의 사진)사용 금지 독일.

팔월 4, 2021 – 워싱턴, DC, 미국: 우리. Senator Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) 상원 국토안보 및 정부 업무 위원회 회의에서 연설. (Michael Brochstein / Sipa USA의 사진)사용 금지 독일. (Michael Brochstein / Sipa USA의 사진)

“Ms. Sinema is, at heart, a Democrat of convenience and expediency; she has a chance now to show that independents aren’t just a New England eccentricity,” 그녀는 덧붙였다.

Cottle detailed Sinema’s history with the Democratic Party, her journey from progressive activism to becoming a moderate focused on working across the aisle and hereccentric rebelpersona she’s now known for within the U.S. 상원.

If she struck out on her own, she could perhaps settle into being an independent rather than worrying about spotlighting her independence. This might not alter her policy positions, but maybe she wouldn’t feel compelled to make such a show of it,” Cottle wrote. “비슷하게, if she dropped the party label, maybe Democrats would eventually stop regarding every disagreement as treason.

With a little luck, and the pressure of total commitment gone, everyone might wind up getting along better than ever,” 그녀는 덧붙였다. “All that said, the deck is stacked against her. But Ms. Sinema loves a good challenge, and she fancies herself a trailblazer. If she really wants to make politics safe for independent voices, she may decide it’s worth taking the leap.

댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..