워싱턴 수학은 이렇게:
1. 조 바이든은 이날 2020 그가 흑인 여성을 대법원에 지명하고 싶은 캠페인 흔적.
2. 스티븐 브라이어 대법관, 법정에서 물러난다. (He is expected to formally announce his decision on Thursday.)
3. 카말라 해리스 부통령, who is African American and South Asian American, 있다 struggled in adjusting to the #2 직업.
And bingo bango began the chatter about Kamala Harris on the court — she’s a lawyer and was attorney general of California, 아무튼! — and Biden being free to pick a new VP.
Fox’s Harris Faulkner was quick to jump on the notion. “So this person has to be a woman, she has to be Black and she’s gotta be younger. Anybody thinking what I’m thinking,” 그녀가 물었다. “They don’t know what to do with Kamala Harris in the White House right now. And I can’t be the only person seeing this.”
Tweeted conservative pundit Bill Kristol (아마도) 농담으로:
“Straightforward from here. 유월 30: Court overturns Roe. 칠월 1: Breyer resigns, says Court ‘needs aggressive progressive justices.’ 칠월 4. Biden picks Harris for Court. Harris resigns as VP. 칠월 5. Biden picks Romney as VP, says national unity needed for the world crisis.”
이, 이다, 하나, not going to happen. For a few reasons.
먼저, Harris has chosen a life in elected office; she’s served continuously in office since 2004, when she was elected district attorney of San Francisco.
둘째, she is next in line to be the president of the United States. Whenever Biden decides to call it quits (or loses reelection), she is, without question, the early favorite to replace or follow him.
Third, while the Biden team has said they want to look for SCOTUS candidates with different resumes from the people currently on the court, 있다 plenty of credible candidates currently in the judiciary.
요점: Playing fantasy politics — candidates swapping offices to create new openings — is a favorite parlor game of Washington’s permanent political class. 그러나, on this one, it ain’t happening.
