Asked about the grand jury subpoenas, Bannon’s attorney Robert Costello told CNN: “I am unaware of these matters.”
A spokeswoman for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg declined to comment.
Federal investigation and pardon
Federal prosecutors with the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York previously charged Bannon and three others, alleging they had defrauded donors in the border wall effort, que recaudó más de $ 25 millón.
Bannon was charged with diverting more than $ 1 million to pay a co-conspirator and cover hundreds of thousands of dollars in personal expenses. Prosecutors alleged that the donors, including some in New York, were falsely told that all the money contributed would go toward the construction effort.
Manhattan prosecutors subpoenaed bank records and quietly worked on the investigation over the past year as they were also investigating Trump and his real estate business, sources familiar with the matter told CNN. But the district attorney’s office has deferred a charging decision on Bannon until federal prosecutors conclude their case against his three co-defendants, who were not pardoned, fuentes dijeron a CNN.
In April two of Bannon’s alleged co-conspirators in the border wall effort
, Brian Kolfage and Andrew Badolato
, pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud
. Kolfage also pleaded guilty to two counts of filing a false tax return and one count of wire fraud in connection with filing a false tax return
Timothy Shea, a fourth man charged in the fundraising effort, is on trial in federal court.
An attorney for Kolfage declined to comment on whether his client had been subpoenaed as part of the state-level probe. Attorneys for Badolato and Shea did not respond to CNN’s request for comment.
Manhattan prosecutors are expected to make a charging decision after that trial concludes, sources tell CNN. The grand jury subpoenas are an indication that they are moving closer to that decision.
Since Bannon was charged but the federal case was never brought to a conclusion, lawyers familiar with the issue say, he would not have double-jeopardy grounds to challenge any possible state charges.