Protests at justices’ homes ‘nothing’ compared to ‘forcing us to bear children we don’t want': LA Times column

Dismissing the justices beingslightly inconvenienced at homeas not abig deal,” Abcarian wrote, “That’s nothing compared with the cost they impose on Americans who may be about to lose control over their own bodies.

She used statistics from the National Abortion Federation about instances of violence directed at abortionists and clinics over the last 45 years to justify angry mobs descending upon family homes, 说, “I just can’t get too worked up about it.

In almost 50 年份, 曾经有 过度 63 million abortions, which pro-lifer advocates count as human deaths.

Protesters at the home of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito

Protesters at the home of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito (我不会在乎别人对我的评价)

PRO-CHOICE PROTESTS THE LATEST IN LIBERAL MEDIA’S HISTORY OF DEFENDING VIOLENCE BY LEFT-WING ACTIVISTS

Solely focusing on protests outside the justices’ residences, she described them asrelatively low-key” 和 “even lighthearted,” and ignored the 暴力, 威胁破坏行为 against pro-life organizations and churches across the country in the past week.

Despite the fact that the leaked decision overturning Roe v. Wade was only a draft, with the final outcome unknown, she quoted one protester approvingly who said, “You don’t get to take away my bodily autonomy andenjoy your Saturday night at home.

Abcarian falsely claimed protesters were forced to go to the justices’ homes because itwas not an option” 至 “protest outside the Supreme Court itself.She blamed the see-through fencing erected around the building, quoting a Catholics for Choice spokesman describing the barrier asominous and disproportionate.

Abortion-rights protesters wave flags during a demonstration outside of the U.S. 最高法院, 星期日, 可能 8, 2022, 在华盛顿.

Abortion-rights protesters wave flags during a demonstration outside of the U.S. 最高法院, 星期日, 可能 8, 2022, 在华盛顿. ((AP Photo/Gemunu Amarasinghe))

LIBERAL MEDIA GUSHES OVER PRO-CHOICE DEMONSTRATIONS AFTER RIPPING PARENTS PROTESTING SCHOOL BOARDS

Anyone is still free to protest outside the Supreme Court, but Abcarian acted as if that was impossible, 说, “God forbid Americans should exercise their right to protest on the very site where women are being deprived of the right to control their bodies, families and fates.

She even quoted the group organizing the neighborhood protests, ShutDownDC.org, 宣告, “Because it’s been impossible to reach [阿里托] at the Supreme Court (especially now with the enormous fences), we will do it at his home.

She claimeddefenders of the court’s conservative supermajoritywere worried aboutan alleged invasion of the justices’ privacy,” instead of concern over intimidation tactics meant to sway opinions with pending outcomes.

Protesters at the home of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito

Protesters at the home of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito (福克斯新闻)

The conservative justices and their allies, 毕竟, seem to have no qualms about controlling our wombs by forcing us to bear children we don’t want.She scoffed, “That’s what a real invasion of privacy looks like.

She mocked Sen. 泰德·克鲁斯, 德州, 对于 the mobs areliterally threatening the lives of these justices.No word on how she felt when it was recently claimed that bringing up Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson’s record was危险的,” “can lead to violence” 和 “trying to get her killed.”

So the justices will be slightly inconvenienced at home? Big deal,” 她总结.

That’s nothing compared with the cost they impose on Americans who may be about to lose control over their own bodies.

评论被关闭.