担当者. カンナは、バイデンがグラスゴー会議の前に民主党の和解合意を必須と言ったと言います: 'I need this'

進歩的な下院議員は、近い将来に取引が行われると確信していました, 議員は当初評価された和解法案の条件を交渉し続けているので $ 3.5 兆.

NY TIMESTOM FRIEDMAN SAYS DEMOCRATS STRUGGLING BECAUSE THEY’VE ‘GONE TOO FAR TO THE LEFT’

The president looked us in the eye and said, ‘I need this before I go represent the United States in Glasgow,'” Khanna recalled. “American prestige is on the line. Many members understand that, we’re working very hard to get a deal. I understand we’re close and I’m confident we’re gonna get there.

When asked if he would vote for the bipartisan infrastructure bill without the reconciliation bill, Khanna said he would not, and that it would not be enough for Biden either.

“番号, and the president doesn’t want that. The president needs the reconciliation agreement to go to Glasgow,” 彼は言った. “That’s what is gonna deal with climate change, that’s what’s gonna hit his goals of 50% reduction by 2030. I’m confident we will have an agreement, I’m confident that the president will be able to give his word to the House caucus that he has that agreement, and that would then facilitate the vote on the infrastructure bill.

下院議長ナンシーペロシ, D-Calif。, told CNN’s “労働組合の状態” Sunday morning that a deal may not be in place by then, しかし、 “frameworkfor one could be in place. Khanna saidthe details matter” だが “if the president gives his words and has a clear commitment, that will be good enough.

シューマー, MANCHIN TO MEET WITH BIDEN IN DELAWARE: 報告書

A related issue Khanna discussed Sunday was how Congress will pay for the agenda items. One possibility that has been floated as an alternative to tax rate increases on corporations and high-earning individuals is a wealth tax on billionaires. Khanna said thismakes sensebecause billionaires can afford it, but it would not be enough.

Should the billionairestax be paired with a minimum tax on corporations that would prevent companies like Amazon from paying zero income taxes like they did in 2018, 彼は言った, “I would vote for it.

Khanna said he would rather just raise the corporate tax rate, but recognized thatwe have to get a deal.

Two moderates, 意味. ジョー・マンチン, D-W.Va., とキルステンシネマ, D-アリゾナ。, have made it difficult for progressives to get their way. Despite disagreeing with both, Khanna had very different attitudes toward the two senators.

“その. Manchin has been a straight shooter. You know exactly where he stands,” Khanna said. As for Sinema, しかしながら, Khanna expressed frustration because she does not explain the reasoning behind her positions.

She’s unclear about what she believes,” 彼は言った.

コメントは締め切りました.