Reporters admit dismissing Wuhan lab leak theory in part because Republicans proposed it

Once widely cast aside as a racist “阴谋论” 和 “fringenonsense, the possibility that the coronavirus accidentally leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has gained increasing credence in recent weeks. The saga has led to yet another reckoning for mainstream media journalists about groupthink and bias in the industry. Faced with criticism that they blasted the theory last year for political reasons, some reporters have admitted its Republican origins with figures like Sen. 汤姆·科顿, R-方舟, former President Donald Trump, and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo played into why they disparaged it.

ABC News Washington correspondent Jonathan Karl suggested on ABC’s “本星期” Sunday that figures like Trump and Pompeo were not taken seriously by members of the media, 说 “now serious people are saying it needs a serious inquiry.


“是, 我想很多人脸上都有鸡蛋,” Karl said. “这是 Mike Pompeo 最先提出的一个想法, 国务卿, 唐纳德·特朗普, and look some things may be true even if Donald Trump said them. Because Trump was saying so much else, that was just out of control, and because he was, 你懂, making a frankly racist appeal talking about Kung Flu, and the China virus, he said flatly this came from that lab, and it was widely dismissedbut now serious people are saying it needs a serious inquiry.

New York Times reporter David Leonhardt also conceded Sunday many journalists dismissed the lab-leak theory solely because Cotton, a Trump ally and longtime critic of China, proposed it.

I think people made this mistake. I think a lot of people on the political left and a lot of people in the media made the mistake. 他们说, ‘wow if Tom Cotton is saying something, it can’t be true.Or they assumed that. 这是不对的,” he said on CNN.


NBC’s Chuck Todd addressed the issue onMeet The Press” 星期日, saying thatfor many,” the lab leak theory gottangled up in politicsand was conflated with one theory that the Chinese released the virus deliberately.

While interviewing former Trump Deputy National Security Adviser Matthew Pottinger, Todd repeatedly suggested anti-China rhetoric was to blame for media dismissals of the virus.

Did in some ways, the sort of irrational attacks on China, did that slow down efforts of the intelligence community to actually do some fact-finding?” Todd asked.

“好, look, I think what slowed down efforts more than anything else were the early statements that were published by a few scientists dismissing the idea that it could have come out of a lab,” Pottinger said. “And in fact, caricaturing people who thought that it might have come out of a lab.

Do you think your former bossstatements contributed to that a little bit?” Todd asked.

WAPO 专栏作家在 COVID-19 实验室理论关于面部的媒体上炒作: ‘ZERO SELF AWARENESS’

“好, 你懂, there are political mistakes that lead to, 至, 你懂, trouble in government. And then there are institutional shortcomings,” Pottinger said.

The language mirrored that of figures like the New York TimesMaggie Haberman and the Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler last week.

I think it is important to remember that part of the issue is when this was first being reported on and discussed back a few months after the pandemic had begun, was that then President Trump and Mike Pompeo, 国务卿, suggested they’ve seen evidence that this was formed in a lab and they also suggested that is was not released on purpose. But they refused to release the evidence showing what it was and so because of that made this instantly political,” Haberman said on CNN last week.

In a new fact-check timeline that declared the lab theory was “突然” credible, Kessler wrote, “The Trump administration’s messaging was often accompanied by anti-Chinese rhetoric that made it easier for skeptics to ignore its claims.

Washington Post reporter Aaron Blake wrote an analysis 标题, “The vexing ‘lab leak’ theory on China and the coronavirus,” in which he defended reporters dismissing the Trump administration claims that there was a high probability the virus originated in a lab.


Given everything we know about how Trump handled such things, caution and skepticism were invited. 那 (very much warranted) caution and skepticism spilled over into some oversimplification, particularly when it came to summarizing the often more circumspect reporting,” Blake wrote.

The Washington Post’s Josh Rogin blasted reporters on Saturday for their sudden about-face, saying the facts on the ground had not changed out of the blue, and accusing them of bias, “general incompetenceand evenTDS,” short for Trump Derangement Syndrome.

President Biden ordered the intelligence community last week to investigate the origins of the virus and report back in 90 天.

Outlets from the Washington Post and New York Times to CNN and NPR have gone from outright mockery of the idea to taking it seriously, 和 “fact checkshave been updated with editor’s notes about why the theory is no longer necessarily “揭穿” Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Robert Redfield is among the proponents of the theory, pointing to the virusefficient transmission among humans and thegain of functionresearch at the Wuhan lab.

The virustrue origins are still unknown.

福克斯新闻’ Thomas Barrabi and Andrew Kugle contributed to this report.