여성건강보호법. 전국적으로 낙태 접근을 보장하기 위한, failed to reach the 60 통과에 필요한 투표수. 최종 투표는 51-49 across party lines with West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin joining the 50 Republicans in voting no.
Although the bill failed to reach majority support, some reporters described the vote as failing to be passed due to a filibuster from Republicans.
Associated Press White House reporter Zeke Miller reported on the vote tweeting, “상원 민주당원’ bill to write Roe v. Wade into law blocked by GOP-led filibuster as Supreme Court weighs abortion case.”
CNN’s Chief Congressional Correspondent Manu Raju similarly tweeted, “49-51, Senate Dems fall 11 votes shy of breaking a Republican-led filibuster to advance bill on abortion rights. Manchin the lone Democratic NO vote. No Republicans voted in the affirmative.”
ABC News Coordinating Congressional Reporter Trish Turner later wrote, “Republicans successfully filibuster the Dems’ abortion rights bill. Schumer says after that this is just the beginning of votes on this issue.”
The pattern continued outside of Twitter with an MSNBC report of the vote by Steve Benen describing the vote under the headline “GOP filibuster derails bill to codify Roe v. Wade protections.”
“여성건강보호법, designed to codify Roe v. Wade protections, was derailed today by a Republican filibuster, but the fight isn’t over,” Benen wrote.
NBC’s Sahil Kapur also promoted the headline “상원 민주당원’ bill to keep abortion legal nationwide falls to GOP-led filibuster.”
The misleading description of the vote extended to Massachusetts Sen. 엘리자베스 워렌, WHO called for ending the filibuster shortly after the vote.
“I believe in democracy, and I don’t believe the minority should have the ability to block things that the majority wants to do. That’s not in the Constitution. What we’re talking about right now are the individual rights and liberties of half the population of the United States of America. I think that’s enough to say it’s time to get rid of the filibuster,” 워렌이 말했다.
Several commentators called out this framing of the vote, ignoring that the bill couldn’t even reach majority support in the Senate.
National Review senior writer David Harsanyi tweeted, “Filibuster. 또한, Dems don’t have the votes to pass it with a simple majority.”
National Journalism Center Director Becket Adams wrote, “the bill didn’t codify Roe and it wasn’t blocked by a filibuster. it failed to get 50 투표. but other than that, some solid work by the AP.”
Media Research Center Deputy Managing Editor Nick Fondacaro responded to Miller’s tweet noting, “This is the president of the White House Correspondent Association. Everything about this is a lie. It wouldn’t have codified Roe and it wasn’t blocked by a filibuster. Why are you lying?”
Constitutional Law Professor Adrian Vermeule tweeted, “Civics teachers around the country alarmed as they see ‘filibuster’ redefined to mean ‘loses 51-49’”
The Women’s Health Protection Act originally passed in the House in 2021 but was later blocked in the Senate in February 2022. Several liberals have criticized Manchin for refusing to vote with the Democrats in favor of the bill.