“あなたの考慮のために,” クレインは、ダナ・ミルバンクからの論説へのリンクでツイートしました, タイトル, “メディアはバイデンを次のようにひどく扱います – またはより悪い – トランプ. Here’s proof.”
Millbank’s “証明” was research from Forge.ai, a data analytics unit of the information company FiscalNote. The study used algorithms focused on adjectives and their placement in articles – より多い 200,000 そのうちの – to rate the coverage Biden received in the first 11 の月 2021 and the coverage Trump got in the first 11 の月 2020. The process was referred to as “sentiment analysis.”
“My colleagues in the media are serving as accessories to the murder of democracy,” Millbank said.
“Too many journalists are caught in a mindless neutrality between democracy and its saboteurs, between fact and fiction. It’s time to take a stand,” 彼は結論を下した.
But media analysts can recall that, without relying on algorithms, Trump’s relationship with the media was infamously combative. Magazines ran unflattering illustrations of the former president, while liberal networks like CNN ran editorialized chyrons such as, “Angry Trump Turns Briefing Into Propaganda Session” during an April 2020 coronavirus task force briefing. 特に注目すべきは, for years, liberal outlets ran with the narrative the Trump campaign colluded with the Kremlin to win the 2016 大統領選挙.
“うん、. The media is treating Biden worse than Trump, or so says the White House Chief of Staff in advocating one of the most laughable columns of the year,” Fox News contributor Joe Concha said.
“You have to be kidding me,” 担当者. ダン・クレンショー, R-テキサス, ツイート.