San Francisco's 'CAREN Act,' making racially biased 911 noem onwettig, is 'n stap nader daaraan om 'n wet te word

Dit kan binnekort onwettig wees om diskriminerend te maak, rasbevooroordeeld 911 oproepe in San Francisco.

Die “CAREN-wet” (Wees versigtig teen nie-noodgevalle in ras) was introduced in July at a San Francisco Board of Supervisors meeting by Supervisor Shamann Walton.
The ordinance is one step closer to becoming a law. Op Dinsdag, the board unanimously passed the act on first read. Next week, the bill has to be voted on again by the board, and then it will be sent to Mayor London Breed to sign.
The ordinance’s name is a twist on “Karen,” the name social media gives people making racially biased 911 oproepe.
    And it’s not justKaren.There are also names like “Becky,” which has also come to symbolize a stereotype of whiteness. En “Susan.” En “Chad.
    Die “CAREN-wet” has been met with support and opposition since it was proposed. Several residents wrote letters to the board urging them to reconsider renaming the ordinance, citing it is sexist and targets people with the name ofKaren.
    The name of the act places a target on my name as a racist and I am not,” one resident wrote in a letter to the board. “By associating the name ‘Carenor anyone elses name with such a law, really is offensive.
    I do not have objection to this act; the issue it is trying to address is wrong,” wrote another resident. ” I do strongly object to the the name. The insensitive choice of many people to use the name Karen as a general purpose term of disapproval for middle age white women needs to stop.
    The ordinance is similar to the statewide AB 1550 rekening introduced by California Assemblyman Rob Bonta, making it unlawful and accountable for a caller tofabricate false racially biased emergency reports.”.
    Using 911 as a tool for your prejudice towards marginalized communities is unjust and wrong!” Bonta getwiet.
    Racially motivated 911 oproepe aren’t a new occurrence across the country, in spite of a recent uptick following the death of George Floyd, an unarmed black man killed in police custody in Minneapolis.
    Vroeër hierdie somer, a White hotel employee in North Carolina called the police on a guest, a Black woman and her children, wie was using the hotel’s swimming pool. And in May, a White woman called 911 on a Black man who was birdwatching in New York’s Central Park.
    Bonta said the intent of AB 1550 isn’t to discourage Californians in real danger from calling 911.
    This bill could protect millions of Californians from becoming targets of hate and prevent the weaponization of our law enforcement against communities of color,” he said in an online release.
    Racist false reports put people in danger and waste resources,” the ordinance’s co-author, Supervisor Matt Haney, getwiet.
    Though making a false police report is a misdemeanor or felony offense in many states, including California, accountability is lacking for making racially biased calls to law enforcement.
    Other cities have already begun the process to pass similar legislation.
    Los Angeles City Councilman Curren Price introduced a similar motion to the City Council in June exploringcriminal penalties, rights of victims to bring private civil actions and cost recovery by the City,” hy getwiet.
      In 2019, the City Commission in Grand Rapids, Michigan, held a public hearing on aproposed human rights ordinancecriminalizing racially motivated calls to 911 with a fine of up to $ 500.
      In 2018, former New York state Sen. Jesse Hamilton proposed a bill after a woman called 911 on him for campaigning, that would require the local district attorney to investigate these incidents as hate crimes. If the calls were deemed racially motivated, a number of consequences such as fines, sensitivity training or jail time would be issued.

      Laat 'n antwoord

      U e-posadres sal nie gepubliseer word nie. Vereiste velde is gemerk *