它的. 李因“最糟糕”而撕毁民主党同事’ 他听说过关于艾米·科尼·巴雷特法官的批评

它的. Lee rips Democratic colleague for 'worst' criticism he's heard yet of Justice Amy Coney Barrett

它的. 埃德·马基, D-Mass, calling the judicial originalism “种族主义者, sexist, homophobic and a fancy word for discriminationis “patently irresponsible,” 说森. 麦克·李.

术语 “originalismrefers to a judicial interpretation of the law based on a literal reading.

“Of all the irresponsible and inflammatory statements I’ve heard over the last few weeks, and I’ve heard some doozies, this might well be the worst,” Lee, 犹他州, 告诉 ”狐狸 & 友人” on Tuesday.

“If you think about what he is really saying there, 它的. Markey has essentially said that our Constitution is racist. And an effort to understand it, understand it’s words at the time they were written is itself racist and bigoted. I can’t think of a statement that has a greater tendency to undermine the foundation of our Constitutional Republic. I hope, expect, and demand that Sen. Markey retract his statement. It is irresponsible; he can’t defend that,” 李说.

DEMOCRATS SAY REPUBLICANS WILL REGRET BARRETT CONFIRMATION, SLAM ‘MANIPULATIONOF SUPREME COURT

Markey ripped the judicial philosophy espoused by Supreme Court nominee 艾米·康尼·巴雷特 as lawmakers prepared for her confirmation vote on Monday night.

“Originalism is racist. Originalism is sexist. Originalism is homophobic. Originalism is just a fancy word for discrimination,” Markey 在推特上.

单击此处获取FOX新闻应用程序

Lee said that if Barrett’s confirmation is “making the heads of Democrats explode everywhere,” it is because they want the Supreme Court to be “institutions of social policy.”

“Look, for President Trump, this was the SCOTUS trifecta that he managed to pull off. In his first term alone, having put three justices on the U.S. 最高法院,” 星期二. “That doesn’t happen very often and I am glad that it did,“ 他说.

“I think he might well have saved the best for last. Justice Barrett is going to be terrific,” Lee added.

“They don’t want the courts to be limited to judging institutions. They want them to be institutions of social change, of social policy, they want them to take debatable matters beyond debate and, so, that is why this isn’t satisfying to them,” Lee said.

Lee went on to say, “They want something much bigger, much grander than what the Constitution actually allows. Justice Barrett sees the elegant simplicity of the fact that you want judges to interpret the law based on what it says.”

福克斯新闻’ Thomas Barrabi 为本报告做出了贡献.

发表评论

您的电子邮件地址不会被公开. 必需的地方已做标记 *

*