Supreme Court clears the way for House to get Trump White House documents

最高裁判所 cleared the way Wednesday for the release of presidential records from the Trump White House to a congressional committee investigating the January 6, 2021, 米国議会議事堂への攻撃.

The court’s order means that more than 700 documents will be transferred to Congress that could shed light on the events leading up to the insurrection when hundreds of rioters converged on the Capitol attempting to stop certification of the 2020 presidential election results.
Only Justice Clarence Thomas said publicly that he would have granted former President Donald Trump’s request to block the document handover from the National Archives to the House select committee. The other justices did not make their votes public.
    The Biden White House supports releasing the records to the committee, after determining the disclosure is in the nation’s best interest and declining to assert executive privilege.
      The select committee is seeking more than 700 pages of disputed documents as it explores Trump’s role in trying to overturn the 2020 大統領選挙. That includes his appearance at a January 6 rally in which he directed followers to go to the US Capitol where lawmakers were set to certify the election results and “戦い” for their county.
        The documents include activity logs, schedules, speech notes and three pages of handwritten notes from then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadowspaperwork that could reveal goings-on inside the West Wing as Trump supporters gathered in Washington and then overran the Capitol, disrupting the certification of the 2020 投票.
        Trump is also seeking to keep secret a draft proclamation honoring two police officers who died in the siege and memos and other documents about supposed election fraud and efforts to overturn Trump’s loss of the presidency, the National Archives has said in court documents.
          The move effectively moots former Trump’s pending appeal in the case that centered on keeping the documents secret. Lawyers for Trump say the documents are sensitive and privileged records.
          The disagreement between an incumbent President and his predecessor from a rival political party is both novel and highlights the importance of executive privilege and the ability of Presidents and their advisers to reliably make and receive full and frank advice, without concern that communications will be publicly released to meet a political objective,” Trump’s lawyer, Jesse R. Binnall told the justices.
          He stressed that Congress had no valid legislative purpose for requesting the documents. “Congress may not rifle through the confidential presidential papers of a former President to meet political objections,” Binnall added.
          But the Biden administration argued that withholding the records based on executive privilege is not in the interest of the United States. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar said that in light of theextraordinary events” 1月の 6, President Joe Biden had decided that that an assertion of executive privilege isnot justified.
          A federal appeals court ruled against Trump, holding that hehas provided no basis for this court to override President Biden’s judgment and the agreement and accommodations worked out between the Political Branches over these documents.
          The court noted that the eventsmarked the most significant assault on the Capitol since the War of 1812,but agreed to freeze its ruling until the Supreme Court acted.
          Under any of the tests advocated by former President Trump, the profound interests in disclosure advanced by President Biden and the January 6th Committee far exceed his generalized concerns for Executive Branch confidentiality,” the panel of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit wrote.
          水曜日に, the Supreme Court cited part of that sentence. “Because the Court of Appeals concluded that President Trump’s claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent, his status as a former President necessarily made no difference to the court’s decision,” the Supreme Court said.
          Tonight’s ruling is a major setback for former President Trump in his efforts to block the National Archives from turning over documents to the January 6 委員会,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. “Although the justices did not rule on whether the court of appeals correctly rejected his suit, by not blocking the handing over now, the justices have allowed that ruling to be the final word.

          Kavanaugh statement

          Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing alone, said that he agreed with the court’s decision to reject Trump’s request, noting that the order was not based on Trump’s status as a former President.
          But in a statement accompanying the court’s ruling, the Trump nominee said he didn’t agree with a suggestion by the appeals court that a former President may not invoke privilege over documents that occurred during his presidency.
          I respectfully disagree with the Court of Appeals on that point,” Kavanaugh said. “A former president must be able to successfully invoke the Presidential communications privilege for communications that occurred during his Presidency even if the current President does not support the privilege claim,” 彼は言った.
            Kavanaugh added, しかしながら, that to say that a former President can invoke privilege over such communicationsdoes not mean that the privilege is absolute or cannot be overcome.
            このストーリーは壊れており、更新されます.

            コメントは締め切りました.