最高法院可以对罗诉案作出裁决. 周一韦德, 拜登管理员在决定后支持暴力

塞缪尔·阿利托大法官泄露的意见草案表明高等法院计划推翻具有里程碑意义的堕胎案 Roe v. 韦德在全国范围内引发了支持选择的抗议活动和暴力事件的上升. Protesters have targeted the homes of conservative Supreme Court justices and vandals have targeted at least five pro-life crisis pregnancy centers across the U.S. and Catholic churches have been threatened and vandalized.

ROE V. WADE RULING HAS BIDEN ADMINISTRATION BRACING FOR NATIONWIDE WAVE OF VIOLENCE

另外, a memo dated May 13 from DHS reveals that the Biden administration is investigating threats to the Supreme Court building and to justices in the weeks since the leak. The memo first reported by Axios details ongoing investigations into threats toburn down or stormthe Supreme Court building.

一群人聚集在最高法院外, 星期一晚上, 可能 2, 2022 in Washington following reports of a leaked draft opinion by the court overturning Roe v. 韦德.

一群人聚集在最高法院外, 星期一晚上, 可能 2, 2022 in Washington following reports of a leaked draft opinion by the court overturning Roe v. 韦德. (美联社照片/安娜约翰逊)

此外, the DHS memo reportedly says the protests outside conservative justices’ 房屋 “are likely to persist and may increase leading up to and following the issuing of the Court’s official ruling.

DHS is committed to protecting Americansfreedom of speech and other civil rights and civil liberties, including the right to peacefully protest,” a DHS spokesperson told Fox News. “DHS is also committed to working with our partners across every level of government and the private sector to share timely information and intelligence, prevent all forms of violence, and to support law enforcement efforts to keep our communities safe.

The DHS memo goes on to clarify that rhetoric supporting violent extremism does not itself constitute extremism.

Demonstrators protest outside of the U.S. 最高法院, 星期一, 可能 16, 2022, 在华盛顿.

Demonstrators protest outside of the U.S. 最高法院, 星期一, 可能 16, 2022, 在华盛顿. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics does not constitute domestic violent extremism or illegal activity and is constitutionally protected,” the memo reportedly reads.

The Supreme Court issues opinions on Mondays at 10 上午. 和, so the next opportunity to hand down a decision in the case, 多布斯诉. Jackson Women’s Health Center, would be on May 23.

As the court reaches the end of its term, usually by the end of June or first week in July, sometimes it adds additional dates to release opinions with a few days notice in advance. 历史上, decisions in more closely watched cases are issued in the last weeks of the term immediately before the justices adjourn for the summer months.

WHEN WILL THE SUPREME COURT RELEASE A ROE V. 韦德决定?

美国. Supreme Court is seen through a fence with a "Closed Area" sign in Washington, 可能 11, 2022.

美国. Supreme Court is seen through a fence with aClosed Areasign in Washington, 可能 11, 2022. (STEFANI REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

然而, a large fence has been built around the Supreme Court in recent weeks and additional security measures around the building have been implemented in order to secure the area around the high court.

分别, 参议院 unanimously voted to beef up security for justices following last month’s leak. 立法, 叫做 “Supreme Court Police Parity Act,” allows Supreme Court police to arrest individuals who interfere with the court’s ability to perform its duties, and also creates a criminal penalty for individuals who impede or obstruct those duties.

然而, legislation has been stalled in the House as some Democrats claim that bill does not go far enough in offering protections and have called for additional protections for law clerks and other staff members at the Supreme Court.

Security fencing is in place outside the Supreme Court in Washington, 星期六, 可能 14, 2022, ahead of expected abortion right rallies later in the day.

Security fencing is in place outside the Supreme Court in Washington, 星期六, 可能 14, 2022, ahead of expected abortion right rallies later in the day. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

周四接受福克斯新闻采访, 众议院议长 南希·佩洛西, D-Calif。, 似乎表示反对为法官及其家人提供保护, insisting that law enforcement officials should be the ones to determine whether the threats they receive warrant a response.

I think that any need for protection should relate to whatever threat that is there,” 佩洛西说. “And that’s a judgment that is made by our law enforcement.

它的. 迪克·德宾, 莳萝。, told Fox News on Thursday that he believes House Democrats shouldn’thold upthe process of advancing the Senate-passed measure.

福克斯新闻’ Kyle Morris and David Spunt contributed to this report.

评论被关闭.