대법원, NY 법원에 가톨릭 교구에 낙태 관련 판결 재검토 명령

그만큼 대법원 declined to take the case of the Diocese of Albany v. Emami in light of a major ruling it handed down earlier this year siding with a Catholic charity in Philadelphia that declined to screen same-sex couples as foster parents.

The high court ruled in that case, Fulton v. 필라델피아, that the city’s refusal to contract with the charity due to the agency’s same-sex couple policy violated the free exercise clause of the First Amendment.

TEXAS ABORTION LAW: SUPREME COURT HEARS ORAL ARGUMENTS

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (Reuters/Jonathan Ernst)

In the New York case, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany argues that the state’s abortion insurance mandate for employers, approved in 2017, violates its First Amendment rights.

The Supreme Court on Monday vacated a state court ruling upholding the rule and ordered a rehearing of the case for further consideration.

We are gratified and grateful that the Supreme Court has recognized the serious constitutional concerns over New York State’s heavy-handed abortion mandate on religious employers,” Bishop Edward B. Scharfenberger said in a statement.

We are confident that now that the Court has ordered the case remanded for reconsideration in light of last year’s Fulton v. Philadelphia decision, the unconstitutional regulatory action taken by New York State will ultimately be completely overturned as incompatible with our country’s First Amendment guarantee of religious liberty,” Scharfenberger added.

We’re grateful that the Supreme Court has taken action in our case and hopeful that, this time around, the New York Court of Appeals will preserve our ability to serve and encourage our neighbors,” Mother Miriam of the Sisterhood of Saint Mary said in a statement.

판사 클라렌스 토마스, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch said they would have taken up the case for argument.

댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..