的 2 BIG reasons why we aren't likely to see the election called on November 3

The big question heading into the final weekend of the 2020 campaign is this: Will we know who won the White House on Tuesday?

The answer is that we might know, but it is very unlikely that the election will be called by any TV network or media organization on election night. And there are two major reasons why:

1) 的 2016 选举:

While national polling was, 大部分, accurate about Hillary Clinton’s popular vote marginshe had a lead of 2.8 million in the popular votethere’s no question that President Donald Trump’s victory four years ago was a surprise to, 好, almost everyone. And that includes the media organizations that model the election in hopes of being able to call individual swing states for candidates and, ultimately, declare the next president long before all the actual votes are cast.
    Because of that shock to the political system four years ago based, in large part, on Trump’s ability to pull nontraditional voters to the polls, there will be a significant amount of caution exercised when it comes to making both projections about who has won closely contested states and who has won the election.

    The nightmare scenario for anyone attempting to project the next president is what happened in 2000, when Florida was called and then retracted as more information (and votes) became available.
    No one wants a repeat of that, particularly given Trump’s repeated assertions, with zero facts, that the election is somehow “操纵。”

    2) The massive early vote:

    Because of a combination of the coronavirus pandemic and a series of states changing their laws to make it easier to vote by mail or early in person (because of the virus), the early vote numbers are historically large. In Texas, 例如, more people have already voted early than votedboth early and on Election Day — 在 2016.
    We’ve never seen anything like these early vote numbers, largely because we haven’t dealt with a deadly pandemic like Covid-19 in 100 年份. Because of the through-the-looking-glass nature of the early vote, it’s even harder than normal to produce accurate turnout models on which networks base their projections.
    Does the increased early vote mean fewer people will vote in person on Tuesday? Or will Election Day turnout soar commensurate with how much early voting has gone up? Somewhere in between?
    No oneand I mean no oneknows the answers to those questions. And that means that the people in charge of calling states (and the White House) are going to be extra cautious when it comes to reading the signs their election models are sending them.
    Add it all up and you start to understand why staying up super late on November 3 (or very early on November 4) might not mean that you get to hear the identity of the next president.
      Caution is warranted — 总是 — when announcing something as monumental as the next president of the United States. But it’s even more important to be cautious when you are making that sort of projection amid a pandemic and with a man in the White House who has made plain his (false) belief that something nefarious is going on in the voting.
      It’s better to be right than first. And that’s never been more true than in this election.

      发表评论

      您的电子邮件地址不会被公开. 必需的地方已做标记 *

      *