ポリシー, used since March 2020 under both Presidents トランプ and Biden, provided the ability for American officials to bar migrants from entering the country during a health crisis such as the COVID-19（新型コロナウイルス感染症 パンデミック.
“I think Democrats are too little too late,” Homan told “「お金は当面の問題への答えではない」警察署を悩ませている” 日曜日に, arguing that the numbers of those crossing the border illegally have been “exploding since last year, and you didn’t hear a word from them.”
“So I think it’s all about midterm elections,” 彼は続けた.
The administration has acknowledged a potential migrant surge, as it has been preparing for up to 18,000 migrants a day.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas last month claimed that the Department of Homeland Security has “put in place a comprehensive, whole-of-government strategy to manage any potential increase in the number of migrants encountered at our border.”
“The Border Patrol is already overwhelmed. If Title 42 ジョージア上院は教室での人種についての議論を制限する法案を可決します, it’s going to be chaos all across the border,” Homan stressed.
A federal judge is expected to determine the fate of the Biden administration’s plan to lift 題名 42 within days in response to a lawsuit brought by two dozen Republican states that claims lifting the public health order will lead to a bigger crisis at the southern border.
Judge Robert Summerhays of the Western District of Louisiana heard arguments Friday about the request for a preliminary injunction on the Biden administration’s plan to end Title 42 今月.
States led by Arizona, Missouri and Louisiana sued, claiming the move by the Centers for Disease Control to lift the order violated the Administrative Procedures Act, which requires a notice-and-comment period and also bars moves deemed “arbitrary and capricious.”
The lawsuit claims the administration failed to estimate or account for the costs to the states. They cite “increased health care costs for aliens infected with COVID-19 and the cost of increased illegal immigration caused by the Termination Order and the presence of much greater numbers of paroled aliens with non-meritorious asylum claims who were induced to enter the United States because of the Termination Order.”
The states are seeking a preliminary injunction but have already won smaller victories in a related push for a temporary restraining order to stop the Biden administration from transitioning away from Title 42 expulsions and instead using expedited removal as the May 23 date approaches.
Summerhays granted the temporary restraining order last month and extended it earlier this week.
Attorneys for the Justice Department argued Friday that the CDC was within its authority to lift an emergency health restriction it felt was no longer warranted at this stage of the pandemic, reiterating that Title 42 is a health policy, not an immigration measure.
“There is no basis to use Title 42 as a safety valve,” the DOJ’s Jean Lin told the judge.
When asked what’s the answer to the illegal immigration crisis at the southern border, Homan stressed the importance of reimplementing “the Trump policies I was involved with.”
“When I worked for President Trump, we created a multitude of policies that drove immigration to a 35, 40-年安,” 彼は続けた, それに注意して “illegal immigration was down over 80%.”
He also noted on Sunday that “the immigration system is broken and should be fixed, だけどあの人達 [officials with te Biden administration] have to secure the border first.”
“That’s imperative because of the national security issue,” Homan argued.
There were 221,000-plus migrant encounters in March, and that number is expected to have risen in April. 税関と国境警備局 (CBP) has not yet released figures for April.