그러나, wait there was more! “Congress should proceed with caution on any additional spending and I will not vote for a reckless expansion of government programs,” added Manchin. “No op-ed from a self-declared Independent socialist is going to change that.”
While that might not seem like much to you, for the obsessively polite Senate, that level of personal back-and-forth is roughly the equivalent of the Squid Game. And while it may the most personal Sanders and Manchin have been, it’s far from the first time the two men have taken their disagreements about the Biden agenda public in recent weeks.
“I can’t speak for Mr
. 만친. I’m not a psychologist
,” Sanders said on CNN earlier this month when asked about Manchin’s ongoing opposition to the social safety net legislation and its proposed
$ 3.5 trillion price tag
Manchin has given as well as he has gotten
. Asked about his opposition to a broader bill with a higher price tag
, the West Virginia Democrat responded
: “I don’t believe that we should turn our society into an entitlement society
. I think that we should still be a compassionate
, rewarding society.
To which Sanders then offered this: “[평의원] Manchin has a right to fight for his point of view, has not only a right to be heard, he has a right to get some compromises. He’s a member of the Senate. But two people do not have the right to sabotage what 48 want, and what the President of the United States wants. That to me is wrong.”
월요일에, Manchin shot back
, 다시, at Sanders
52 senators who don’t agree
, 확인, and there’s two that want to work something out if possible in a most rational reasonable way
,” 그는 말했다.
And as CNN’s 마누 라주 reported earlier this month
, Biden equated getting the two men in the same room with
“살인” after liberal Rep
. 로 칸나 (캘리포니아) suggested doing just that in hopes of hashing out a compromise
Both men insist that their disagreements are not personal — or taken as such. But to believe that, you have to believe that all politics isn’t personal, 어느, decades of evidence makes clear, 그것은.
It’s not at all clear how the tension plays out. 민주당 — up to and including Manchin and Sanders — believe that the party must find a way to pass parts of Biden’s agenda. Manchin prefers that Congress pass the $ 1.2 일조 “hard infrastructure plan,” which has already been approved by a bipartisan Senate majority, 먼저. Sanders wants the larger safety net bill passed — for fear that if the hard infrastructure bills goes through, moderates like Manchin may walk away from a larger bill altogether.
또 뭔데, the two men’s opposing stances are good for their politics back home. Vermont is among the most progressive states in the country and Sanders’ advocacy for more government spending will be greeted with plaudits in the state. 만친, 반면에, represents a state Donald Trump won by 39(!) 포인트 2020. The conservatism of the state’s electorate makes Manchin’s role as a break on the policies being pushed by the likes of Sanders a winning one, political speaking, 주에서.
The simple fact is this: Sanders and Manchin are never going to agree on the breadth — and cost — of the social safety net legislation. The key for Biden, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and other deal-minded Democrats is to find a way to lower the temperature between them.