フォースA-woke-ns: Scientific American deems 'JEDI' a 'problematic' term

水曜日に, Scientific American published an article タイトル “「JEDI」という用語が正義を促進するプログラムを説明するのに問題がある理由, エクイティ, 多様性と包括性。” 作品の中で, the magazine suggested that the term JEDI, used to reference “正義感, equity, diversity and inclusioninitiatives, is actually a harmful term.

Put simply, the baggage of Jedi and スターウォーズ is too heavy to burden our justice-oriented initiatives with and may actually undermine these efforts,” the piece explained.

‘ROE V WADE’ DIRECTOR NICK LOEB REACTS TO CRITICISM OF FILM: ‘THE MEDIA HAS BEE SO VISCERAL TODAY’

Among the grievances the article gave included thethreatening inclusion and sense of belonging” そして “problematic cultural legacy” の “Star Wars.

The article readWhile an overarching goal of JEDI initiatives is to promote inclusion, the term JEDI might make people feel excluded. Star Wars is popular but divisive. Identifying our initiatives with it may nudge them closer to the realm of fandom, manufacturing in-groups and out-groups.

The article was roundly ridiculed on Twitter as people called out the supposedscientific” マガジン.

Political commentator Dave Rubin tweetedSomeone just blow up the Internet already…

Former Portland State University philosophy professor Peter Boghossian tweetedLegitimacy crisis. @sciam has been corrupted by woke ideology.

Daily Caller editor Hayden Daniel wrote’Scientific’ American lmao.

The article also included a disclaimer readingThis is an opinion and analysis article; the views expressed by the author or authors are not necessarily those of Scientific American.

Scientific American has already come under fire in 2021 for promoting more political andproblematic” ビュー. に 4月, the magazine called on the media to recognize climate change as aclimate emergency.

The planet is heating up way too fast. It’s time for journalism to recognize that the climate emergency is here,” Scientific American wrote.

六月, the magazine also faced controversy for accusing Israel of practicingvaccine apartheidin a since-removed opinion piece.

コメントは締め切りました.