Questo membro della Camera repubblicana ha scelto la Costituzione al posto di Donald Trump

Del 10 Repubblicani della Camera che hanno votato per mettere sotto accusa Donald Trump per le sue azioni durante il mese di gennaio 6 Rivolta al Campidoglio degli Stati Uniti, South Carolina’s Tom Rice was the biggest surprise by far.

Dopotutto, Rice had cut a decidedly conservativeand pro-Trumpfigure in Washington since being elected to the eastern South Carolina 7th district in 2012. (Rice was uno di 139 Republican House members to object to the Electoral College results on January 6.)
Rice didn’t say much about his vote in its immediate aftermath. But in a terrific Washington Post profile of him that ran earlier this week, Rice puts its plainly:
    It was very clear to me, I took an oath to defend the Constitution. I didn’t take an oath to defend Donald Trump. What he did was a frontal assault on the Constitution.
      Quale, bene, si.
        There’s very little debate that Trump not only incited the mob that violently rioted at — e in — the Capitol building, but stood by in silence for hours after it became clear that situation had grown out of control and that people were being hurt. (Five people died as a result of the insurrection; più di 100 police officers were wounded.)
        What’s surprising is that Rice is one of only 10 Repubblicani — the vast majority of whom define themselves asconstitutional conservatives” — willing to stand up for that Constitution when confronted with Trump’s clear assault on it.
          Rice’s comments serve as a reminder that harshly judging Trump for what happened on January 6 should not be a partisan act. Republican members of Congress as well as Democratic ones were endangered as the violent rioters ran through the US Capitol. The insurrectionists were chanting, “Hang Mike Pence” — the Republican vice president of the United States.

          Actively undermining a free and fair election and then inciting a mob that sought to interfere with the Electoral College certification is simply a dangerous act for our democracy.
          That it was done by a Republican President who commands significant loyalty among the GOP base should be immaterial to the calculations made by elected officials in the Party.
            Should,” ovviamente, is the operative word there. Barring a handful of principled objectors like Rice, the rest of the Republican Party went along with Trump’s behavior out of a self-interested worry for their own political careers.
            Il punto: Rice could well lose his seat in a primary next year to a candidate willing to blindly back Trump at all times. Which shows you exactly where the Republican Party is at the moment.

            I commenti sono chiusi.