En el momento, there was heated political rhetoric around the issue with then-President Donald Trump claiming in a series of tweets
, just weeks ahead of the
2018 elecciones intermedias, that he would declare a
” over migrant caravans moving north toward the US
In early 2019, journalists, attorneys and migrant caravan supporters raised concerns that CBP was harassing people over their work on the migrant caravan, prompting the inspector general investigation.
The watchdog found that CBP officials, particularly from the intelligence section, metido “lookouts,” which are electronic alerts, on individuals they suspected of being affiliated with the migrant caravan and others who may have had information about those individuals.
“Most of the caravan-related lookouts resulted in lengthier, enhanced inspections for those individuals when they crossed the U.S. frontera,” with some lasting several hours, según el informe.
While the watchdog report did not find evidence that this process was used to harass or retaliate, other issues were uncovered.
los “most serious” concerns related to lookouts that CBP placed on a particular group of journalists. One CBP official placed lookouts on the five journalists. Over the following weeks, all five journalists came back to the US, and CBP referred them to secondary inspection. None of the five journalists were asked about an illegal crossing incident — the purported reason they had an alert for additional screening and questioning.
Almost half of the caravan-related lookouts may not have complied with policy, as many CBP officials were found to not know the proper standard for placing alerts on people, según el informe.
According to the inspector general, all CBP’s caravan-related lookouts were related in some way to suspected criminal activity, but for 25 de 51 gente, there was no evidence of direct involvement in illegal activity.
“En lugar de, those lookouts were based solely on the individuals’ associations with other people who were suspected of illegal activity,” el informe dice.
En un caso, a CBP official placed lookouts on “two attorneys who previously crossed the border with someone who was believed to be an administrator of a caravan-related online chat group on WhatsApp,” según el informe.
Many involved CBP officials told the inspector general that they “were not aware of any policies related to the proper bases for placing lookouts or had not received any training on the issue. Consequently, the officials did not have consistent understandings about when they could place lookouts,” el informe dice.
“Adicionalmente, some US citizens were subjected to repeated and unnecessary secondary inspections, because CBP did not promptly remove lookouts that were no longer necessary, as required by CBP policy,” el informe dice.
Durante este tiempo, CBP also “inappropriately” asked Mexico to deny entry to at least 14 US citizens associated with the caravan.
Although there are some circumstances when CBP may restrict travel rights to other countries, CBP “could not articulate any genuine basis for sending this request” and later admitted that the reasons provided to Mexico were not true, el informe dijo.
There were also information sharing issues associated with this operation. “CBP officials repeatedly and improperly sent the names and sensitive information of U.S. citizens to Mexican officials and inappropriately asked Mexico to deny entry to at least 14 of those individuals,” the report found.
The inspector general issued six recommendations, including updating policy guidance and reviewing cases of when CBP revealed sensitive personally identifiable information to Mexican officials to potentially take remedial actions.
CBP agreed with all six recommendations in the report and pointed CNN to its letter in the report, calling its response to the thousands of migrants seeking admission to the US through Mexico “esencial” due to the potential for mass irregular migration and violence against law enforcement when the caravan reached the US border.
“CBP is pleased to note the OIG’s recognition that CBP officials had legitimate reasons for placing lookouts on individuals suspected of organizing, or being associated with, or having information about the migrant caravan, including some instances U.S. journalists and attorneys,” wrote Henry Moak, CBP’s chief accountability officer, in response to the findings.
“The use of lookout is integral to CBP’s mission,” él agregó.