Trump lawsuit against Big Tech could ‘break new ground’ on First Amendment protections: Parler interim CEO

Meckler made the comment the day after Trump announced that he will lead a lawsuit over alleged censorship against ツイッター, フェイスブック そして グーグル, which are the three tech companies that removed him from their platforms after the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol by a mob of his supporters.

The lawsuit will be a class-action filing, with Trump as the lead plaintiff, claiming that he’s been censored by the companies.

There is no better evidence that Big Tech is out of control than the fact that they banned the sitting president of the United States earlier this year,” Trump said speaking from his golf club in Bedminster, ニュージャージー.

If they can do it to me, they can do it to anyone,” 彼が追加した.

ツイッター, YouTube and Facebook each barred Trump over his claims that the presidential election was stolen, alleging that he contributed to the violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6. YouTube is owned by Google.

After close review of recent Tweets from the @realDonaldTrump account and the context around them – specifically how they are being received and interpreted on and off Twitter – we have permanently suspended the account due to the risk of further incitement of violence,” Twitter wrote in a blog post about its decision.

But Republicans and Trump himself have maintained that these companies are unfairly censoring conservatives, pointing to international dictators who still can post on Twitter.

TRUMP TO SUE FACEBOOK, TWITTER, GOOGLE OVER ALLEGED CENSORSHIP, SAYS THEY’VE ‘CEASED TO BE PRIVATE’

“ソーシャルメディア企業は公式には民間企業ですが, in recent years they have ceased to be private with the enactment and their historical use of Section 230, which profoundly protects them from liability,” トランプは言った. “It is in effect a massive government subsidy, these companies have been co-opted, coerced and weaponized by government actors to become the enforcers of illegal, unconstitutional censorship.

Trump called social media companiesthe de facto censorship arm of the U.S. government.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act states thatNo provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

It has been pivotal in the rise of today’s social media by allowing not only Internet service providers but also Twitter, フェイスブック, YouTube and others to be shielded from liability from content posted on their platforms by third parties in most cases.

Meckler said that he agrees with Trumpthat the existing law says that the First Amendment protections do not apply in censorship by private companies.

He then pointed toa theory budding in academic communities,” in which “大きい, all-encompassing ソーシャルメディア 企業, act as essentially a state actor when they censor people.

Meckler went on to explain that the companiesessentially have the same power as the government” とは “sometimes influenced or pressured by the government to do these things.

And so theoretically, you could apply what we call the ‘state actor theory’ to them and impose First Amendment restrictions,” 彼は続けた, それに注意して “it’s a developing area of the law and it is possible that this could break new ground.

Meckler said thatoriginally the First Amendment was designed to protect freedom of speech in the public sphereand explained that then thepublic sphere literally meant the soapbox,” which meantstanding on a street corner, talking about whatever you want [そして] handing out pamphlets.

He then noted that in the present timethis starts to get murky,” pointing out that currently the Internet is used as a forum to speak publiclyand these companies control that world with an iron fist.

So the question becomes, where is public speech and who now has First Amendment protection?” Meckler said.

This idea of prior restraint normally applies when the government prevents somebody from speaking,” 彼は続けた. “Now we’re talking about a private entity and the extension of that doctrine of freedom of speech under the First Amendment to a private person speaking on a private entity would be an extension of First Amendment protections.

A spokesperson for Twitter declined to comment on Trump’s lawsuit. Representatives for Facebook and Google did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment on the lawsuit and Meckler’s statements.

Fox News’ Tyler Olson, Fox Business’ Evie Fordham and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

コメントは締め切りました.