Trump elogia la decisión de la Corte Suprema que anuló Roe v. Vadear, says ruling 'will work out for everybody'

“Esto es siguiendo la Constitución., y devolver los derechos cuando deberían haberse dado hace mucho tiempo,” Triunfo dijo a Fox News.

ACTUALIZACIONES EN VIVO: CORTE SUPREMA ANULA ROE V. WADE IN LANDMARK OPINION

When asked if he had a message for any of his supporters who may be pro-choice, Nikki Haley regresa a New Hampshire para apoyar la candidatura a la Cámara del ex funcionario del Departamento de Estado de Trump: “creo, en el final, this is something that will work out for everybody.

This brings everything back to the states where it has always belonged,” Trump dijo.

When asked whether he feels he played a role in the reversal of Roe v. Vadear, after having appointed three conservative justices to the high court, the former president told Fox News: “God made the decision.

El expresidente Donald Trump

El expresidente Donald Trump (imágenes falsas)

Triunfo, durante su presidencia, appointed conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.

With those appointments, the high court became majority conservative, with Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Clarence Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett.

CORTE SUPREMA ANULA ROE V. WADE IN LANDMARK OPINION

Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elana Kagan, all appointed by Democrats, dissented the majority opinion Friday to overturn Roe v. Vadear.

The ruling came in the court’s opinion in Dobbs v. Organización de Salud de la Mujer de Jackson, which centered on a Mississippi law that banned abortion después 15 semanas de embarazo. The Republican-led state of Mississippi asked the Supreme Court to strike down a lower court ruling that stopped the 15-week abortion ban from taking place.

We end this opinion where we began. Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the court’s opinion.

Alito’s opinion began with an exploration and criticism of Roe v. Wade and its holding that while states havea legitimate interest in protecting ‘potential life,” this interest was not strong enough to prohibit abortions before the time of fetal viability, understood to be at about 23 weeks into pregnancy.

The Court did not explain the basis for this line, and even abortion supporters have found it hard to defend Roe’s reasoning,” Alito wrote.

Supreme court abortion decision.

Supreme court abortion decision. (Joshua Comins/Fox News)

Breyer, Kagan and Sotomayor dissented, writing that Roe and Caseyunderstood the difficulty and divisiveness of the abortion issue,” and by overturning the landmark Roe v. decisión de wade, una mujer “has no rights to speak of.

The Court knew that Americans hold profoundly different views about the ‘moral[ity]’ of ‘terminating a pregnancy, even in its earliest stage,'” ellos escribieron. “And the Court recognized that ‘the State has legitimate interests from the outset of the pregnancy in protectingthe ‘life of the fetus that may become a child.'

MORE THAN 2 DOZEN STATES TO RESTRICT ABORTIONS AFTER ROE V. WADE VOLCADO

So the Court struck a balance, as it often does when values and goals compete,” ellos escribieron. “It held that the State could prohibit abortions after fetal viability, so long as the ban contained exceptions to safeguard a woman’s life or health.

Pro life and pro choice protesters waiting to hear the Supreme Court decision.

Pro life and pro choice protesters waiting to hear the Supreme Court decision. (Joshua Comins/Fox News)

“Hoy dia, the Court discards that balance,” ellos escribieron. “It says that from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of.

With sorrowfor this Court, but more, for the many millions of American women who have today lost a fundamental constitutional protectionwe dissent,” ellos escribieron.

Fox News’ Ronn Blitzer and Kelly Laco contributed to this report.

los comentarios están cerrados.