Trump praises Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. 걸어 건너기, says ruling 'will work out for everybody'

This is following the Constitution, and giving rights back when they should have been given long ago,” 지우다 폭스 뉴스에 말했다.

라이브 업데이트: 대법원, ROE V를 뒤집다. WADE IN LANDMARK OPINION

When asked if he had a message for any of his supporters who may be pro-choice, 트럼프는 폭스 뉴스에 말했다: “나는 생각한다, 결국, this is something that will work out for everybody.

This brings everything back to the states where it has always belonged,” 트럼프는 말했다.

When asked whether he feels he played a role in the reversal of Roe v. 걸어 건너기, after having appointed three conservative justices to the high court, the former president told Fox News: “God made the decision.

도널드 트럼프 전 대통령

도널드 트럼프 전 대통령 (게티 이미지)

지우다, during his presidency, appointed conservative Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.

With those appointments, the high court became majority conservative, with Chief Justice John Roberts, 사무엘 알리 토 판사, Justice Clarence Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett.

대법원, ROE V를 뒤집다. WADE IN LANDMARK OPINION

Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elana Kagan, all appointed by Democrats, dissented the majority opinion Friday to overturn Roe v. 걸어 건너기.

The ruling came in the court’s opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which centered on a Mississippi law that banned abortion 후 15 임신 주. The Republican-led state of Mississippi asked the Supreme Court to strike down a lower court ruling that stopped the 15-week abortion ban from taking place.

We end this opinion where we began. Abortion presents a profound moral question. The Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each State from regulating or prohibiting abortion. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. We now overrule those decisions and return that authority to the people and their elected representatives,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the court’s opinion.

Alito’s opinion began with an exploration and criticism of Roe v. Wade and its holding that while states havea legitimate interest in protecting ‘potential life,” this interest was not strong enough to prohibit abortions before the time of fetal viability, understood to be at about 23 weeks into pregnancy.

The Court did not explain the basis for this line, and even abortion supporters have found it hard to defend Roe’s reasoning,” Alito wrote.

Supreme court abortion decision.

Supreme court abortion decision. (Joshua Comins/Fox News)

브라이어, Kagan and Sotomayor dissented, writing that Roe and Caseyunderstood the difficulty and divisiveness of the abortion issue,” and by overturning the landmark Roe v. 웨이드 판결, a womanhas no rights to speak of.

The Court knew that Americans hold profoundly different views about the ‘moral[ity]’ of ‘terminating a pregnancy, even in its earliest stage,'” 까지 측정한 것. “And the Court recognized that ‘the State has legitimate interests from the outset of the pregnancy in protectingthe ‘life of the fetus that may become a child.'

이상 2 DOZEN STATES TO RESTRICT ABORTIONS AFTER ROE V. WADE OVERTURNED

So the Court struck a balance, as it often does when values and goals compete,” 까지 측정한 것. “It held that the State could prohibit abortions after fetal viability, so long as the ban contained exceptions to safeguard a woman’s life or health.

Pro life and pro choice protesters waiting to hear the Supreme Court decision.

Pro life and pro choice protesters waiting to hear the Supreme Court decision. (Joshua Comins/Fox News)

“오늘, the Court discards that balance,” 까지 측정한 것. “It says that from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of.

With sorrowfor this Court, but more, for the many millions of American women who have today lost a fundamental constitutional protectionwe dissent,” 까지 측정한 것.

폭스 뉴스’ Ronn Blitzer and Kelly Laco contributed to this report.

댓글이 닫혀 있습니다..